Influence of providers and nurses on completion of non-targeted HIV screening in an urgent care setting

Abstract

IntroductionDespite recommendations by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) that all adults be offered non-targeted HIV screening in all care settings, screening in acute-care settings remains unacceptably low. We performed an observational study to evaluate an HIV screening pilot in an academic-community partnership health center urgent care clinic.MethodsWe collected visit data via encounter forms and demographic and laboratory data from electronic medical records. A post-pilot survey of perceptions of HIV screening was administered to providers and nurses. Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors associated with completion of testing.ResultsVisit provider and triage nurse were highly associated with both acceptance of screening and completion of testing, as were younger age, male gender, and race/ethnicity. 23.5% of patients completed tests, although 36.0% requested screening; time constraints as well as risk perceptions by both the provider and patient were cited as limiting completion of screening. Post-pilot surveys showed mixed support for ongoing HIV screening in this setting by providers and little support by nurses.ConclusionsVisit provider and triage nurse were strongly associated with acceptance of testing, which may reflect variable opinions of HIV screening in this setting by clinical staff. Among patients accepting screening, visit provider remained strongly associated with completion of testing. Despite longstanding recommendations for non-targeted HIV screening, further changes to improve the testing and results process, as well as provider education and buy-in, are needed to improve screening rates.

Points to consider for reporting, screening for and preventing selected comorbidities in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in daily practice: a EULAR initiative

“…Indeed, a systematic screening for comorbidities may take up to an hour,14 particularly when undertaken for the first time. However, for subsequent screenings (eg, 1 or 2 years later), the process should be quicker and will be more efficient if the initial screening is easily available (eg, if these data are available in the medical records or in electronic form) 76. We are aware that the reporting form is detailed and long, but this could be implemented as a hierarchical form (ie, with sections to be filled-in only if relevant).…”

Implementation of a Collaborative HIV and Hepatitis C Screening Program in Appalachian Urgent Care Settings

“…A recent review of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey revealed that HIV testing was significantly greater in outpatient ambulatory medical care settings than in emergency departments (ED) and physicians’ offices, suggesting that urgent cares may be an important setting in which to expand testing. 9 – 10 HCV has been identified in individuals outside of current CDC recommendations for testing, indicating a need to implement universal screening during patient visits. 11 Multiple studies have demonstrated success in using a best practice alert (BPA) model, prompting and streamlining the linkage-to-care process.…”