2020
DOI: 10.7879/siej.23.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of puffing protocol on carbonyl compounds emitted from electronic cigarette and heat-not-burn tobacco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schaller et al [ 13 ] have determined the ammonia emissions from device A when employing the Health Canada Intense (HCI) protocol [ 20 ] and reported 15.6 µg/stick, which corresponds to 24 µg L −1 (55 mL of puff volume, 12 puffs). This difference from the previous report must be caused by the difference in the puffing protocol because the chemical composition of mainstream smoke varies with smoking conditions [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The HCI protocol was originally developed for traditional cigarettes with the puffing parameters 55 mL puff volume, 2 s puff duration, and 30 s puff frequency with a “Bell” puffing profile.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Schaller et al [ 13 ] have determined the ammonia emissions from device A when employing the Health Canada Intense (HCI) protocol [ 20 ] and reported 15.6 µg/stick, which corresponds to 24 µg L −1 (55 mL of puff volume, 12 puffs). This difference from the previous report must be caused by the difference in the puffing protocol because the chemical composition of mainstream smoke varies with smoking conditions [ 21 , 22 , 23 ]. The HCI protocol was originally developed for traditional cigarettes with the puffing parameters 55 mL puff volume, 2 s puff duration, and 30 s puff frequency with a “Bell” puffing profile.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%