2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.74.174518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of quenched disorder on the square-to-rhombohedral structural transformation of the vortex lattice of type-II superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most intriguing vortex phenomena is the second magnetization peak effect in the magnetic hysteresis (named the peak or 'fishtail' effect) originating from distinct non-linear modulations of the temperature and magnetic field dependencies of the critical current J c (H, T) due to pinning energy changes [4][5][6]. The proposed mechanisms and theoretical models deal particularly with the vortex-vortex and pinning center-vortex interactions as order/disorder phase transition (long/short range ordering) [7], structural (square/ rhombic lattice) transformation [8], elastic/plastic pinning crossover [6] and 3D/2D pinning change [9]. The peak effect has been thoroughly investigated for various superconductor systems: (i) conventional, like Nb alloys [10] and MgB 2 [11], and (ii) non-conventional such as cuprates [6,12] and iron based superconductors (IBSs), both pnictides [13][14][15][16][17] and chalcogenide FeSeTe systems [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most intriguing vortex phenomena is the second magnetization peak effect in the magnetic hysteresis (named the peak or 'fishtail' effect) originating from distinct non-linear modulations of the temperature and magnetic field dependencies of the critical current J c (H, T) due to pinning energy changes [4][5][6]. The proposed mechanisms and theoretical models deal particularly with the vortex-vortex and pinning center-vortex interactions as order/disorder phase transition (long/short range ordering) [7], structural (square/ rhombic lattice) transformation [8], elastic/plastic pinning crossover [6] and 3D/2D pinning change [9]. The peak effect has been thoroughly investigated for various superconductor systems: (i) conventional, like Nb alloys [10] and MgB 2 [11], and (ii) non-conventional such as cuprates [6,12] and iron based superconductors (IBSs), both pnictides [13][14][15][16][17] and chalcogenide FeSeTe systems [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gaussian approximation study of thermal fluctuations was however performed (Ikeda , 1995;Larkin and Varlamov, 2005) and used to explained the, so called crossing point of the magnetization curves, as well as crossover between the 3D to the 2D behavior (Baraduc et al, 1994;Huh and Finnemore, 2002;Junod et al, 1998;Lin and Rosenstein, 2005;Rosenstein et al, 2001;Salem-Sugui and Dasilva, 1994;Tešanović et al, 1992) In many simulations this model rather than GL was adopted (Ryu et al, 1996;Wilkin and Jensen, 1997). The GL model can be extended also in direction of introducing anisotropy in the a − b plane, like the four -fold symmetric anisotropy leading to transition from the rhombic lattice to the square lattice (Chang et al, 1998a,b;Klironomos and Dorsey, 2003;Park and Huse, 1998;Rosenstein and Knigavko, 1999) observed in many high T c and low T c type II superconductors alike (Eskildsen et al, 2001;Li et al, 2006a) . Dynamics Dynamics of vortex matter can be described by a time dependent generalization of the GL equations (Larkin and Varlamov, 2005).…”
Section: Microscopic Derivations Of the Gl Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Sometimes there are one or more structural transitions in the lattice phase (Divakar et al, 2004;Eskildsen et al, 2001;Gilardi et al, 2002;Jaiswal-Nagar et al, 2006;Johnson et al, 1999;Keimer et al, 1994;Li et al, 2006a;McK. Paul et al, 1998;Sasagawa et al, 2000).…”
Section: Complexity Of the Vortex Matter Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%