2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1266-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Radial Stress Gradient on Strainbursts: An Experimental Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that the rockburst hazard from the double free faces is more likely to be triggered than that of the rock structure with only one free face because the increasing free face decreases the rock strength. The kinetic energy of the ejected fragments from one free face in the previous study of Su et al (2017d) is 0.91 J, which is much less than the result of double free faces in the present study. These statements indicate that the intensity of rockburst from the double free faces is much larger than that of the rock structure with only one free face.…”
Section: Kinetic Energycontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result indicates that the rockburst hazard from the double free faces is more likely to be triggered than that of the rock structure with only one free face because the increasing free face decreases the rock strength. The kinetic energy of the ejected fragments from one free face in the previous study of Su et al (2017d) is 0.91 J, which is much less than the result of double free faces in the present study. These statements indicate that the intensity of rockburst from the double free faces is much larger than that of the rock structure with only one free face.…”
Section: Kinetic Energycontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Compared with the kinetic energy in the double free faces of the tested specimen, the intensity of the rockburst is random on the surface of the specimen. Compared with the self-initiated rockburst from one free face in the previous study of Su et al (2017d), the specimen with one free face which the stress reaches the strength of specimen with double free faces is not subjected to failure. This result indicates that the rockburst hazard from the double free faces is more likely to be triggered than that of the rock structure with only one free face because the increasing free face decreases the rock strength.…”
Section: Kinetic Energymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Souissi et al [36] used numerical simulation analysis to explore the damage zone around the drill bit during the hard-rock drilling process. Zhao et al and Su et al investigated crack propagation in rock specimens containing a drilled hole and subjected to a compressive load [37,38] and explored the way rock strength varied with radial stress using an acoustic emission method. Huang and Yang [39] analyzed the influence of flaw angle and confining pressure on the mechanics properties of rock when subjected to triaxial compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand the mechanism of rockburst more deeply, uniaxial experiments [6][7][8], biaxial experiments [9,10], and true-triaxial unloading experiments were carried out [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. True-triaxial unloading tests can simulate the in situ stress level and reproduce rockburst phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%