2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of rapid COVID-19 vaccine development on vaccine hesitancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The core concept of “uncertainty” in our study captured various aspects of uncertainty related to COVID-19 vaccination identified in previous studies [ 39 , 40 , 41 ], including the speed of development, perceived lack of sufficient testing, and long-term side effects. Past research comparing three hypothetical vaccine scenarios of vaccines being approved in one week, one year, or in two years, found that the shortest-term scenario was associated with significantly lower perceived vaccine efficacy and higher vaccine risks than the longer duration scenarios [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core concept of “uncertainty” in our study captured various aspects of uncertainty related to COVID-19 vaccination identified in previous studies [ 39 , 40 , 41 ], including the speed of development, perceived lack of sufficient testing, and long-term side effects. Past research comparing three hypothetical vaccine scenarios of vaccines being approved in one week, one year, or in two years, found that the shortest-term scenario was associated with significantly lower perceived vaccine efficacy and higher vaccine risks than the longer duration scenarios [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core concept of “uncertainty” in our study captured various aspects of uncertainty related to COVID-19 vaccination identified in previous studies [ 39 , 40 , 41 ], including the speed of development, perceived lack of sufficient testing, and long-term side effects. Past research comparing three hypothetical vaccine scenarios of vaccines being approved in one week, one year, or in two years, found that the shortest-term scenario was associated with significantly lower perceived vaccine efficacy and higher vaccine risks than the longer duration scenarios [ 40 ]. An Australian study [ 22 ] of 3200 adults found more than half of respondents who were hesitant about the COVID-19 vaccine said that they ‘plan to wait and see’ if it is safe, while similarly half of participants in the study of Bangladeshi adults preferred to delay vaccination until there was further information confirming the efficacy of the vaccine [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Zheng (2020) found that online information seeking about COVID-19 had a positive impact on intention to engage in preventive behaviors, such as wearing masks. Similarly, Rosenthal and Cummings (2021) found that media dependency was positively related to willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Considering the bright side of online health information seeking, we first hypothesize that:…”
Section: Online Vaccine Information Seeking As a Stimulus (S)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…O. Lee & Kim, 2015). On the misinformation side, many coordinated anti-vaccination groups exaggerate vaccine side effects to promote conspiracy theories and misinformation on the internet (Chou & Budenz, 2020), which may enhance perceived risks and reduce willingness to take the vaccine (Rosenthal & Cummings, 2021). Also, people who receive information about vaccine-related risks may feel uncertain and lose confidence in vaccination (Nan & Madden, 2012; Yan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These people, who believe that even if the virus is approached, can be easily overcome, they find it unnecessary to be vaccinated [ 35 ]. Changing these approaches of people is important to prevent dangerous epidemic diseases such as COVID-19 [ 36 ]. In this context, short video recordings explaining the dangers of this epidemic in detail should be shared with the public.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%