2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2018.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of reaction time on the structural, optical and electrical performance of copper antimony sulfide nanoparticles using solvothermal method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 The potential for CuSbS 2 as a solar absorber (as well as other semiconductor applications such as dye-sensitized solar cells, thermoelectrics, 14,15 supercapacitors, 2 and battery electrodes 16,17 ) has driven the development of many synthetic methods. Gas-phase (i.e., thermal evaporation, 11 low-temperature atomic layer deposition, 18 and co-sputtering 19 ) and solution-based (i.e., chemical bath deposition, 6,20 electrodeposition, 7 spray pyrolysis, 21 spin coating, 3 solvo/hydrothermal, 22,23 and hot injection 2,4,24 ) synthetic methods have been employed in the successful synthesis of CuSbS 2 thin films and nanomaterials. 25 The first report of CuSbS 2 nanocrystals was from Su, et al in 1999 via a solvothermal method in ethylenediamine.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 The potential for CuSbS 2 as a solar absorber (as well as other semiconductor applications such as dye-sensitized solar cells, thermoelectrics, 14,15 supercapacitors, 2 and battery electrodes 16,17 ) has driven the development of many synthetic methods. Gas-phase (i.e., thermal evaporation, 11 low-temperature atomic layer deposition, 18 and co-sputtering 19 ) and solution-based (i.e., chemical bath deposition, 6,20 electrodeposition, 7 spray pyrolysis, 21 spin coating, 3 solvo/hydrothermal, 22,23 and hot injection 2,4,24 ) synthetic methods have been employed in the successful synthesis of CuSbS 2 thin films and nanomaterials. 25 The first report of CuSbS 2 nanocrystals was from Su, et al in 1999 via a solvothermal method in ethylenediamine.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the "top-down" melt-recrystallization approach requires high temperatures and long reaction times, "bottom-up" methodologies may be preferable because they often yield nanostructured material and require lower temperatures and shorter synthesis times. Previously, Cu-Sb-Se-S nanomaterials have been synthesized by a variety of wet-chemical approaches, such as hot-injection (Ramasamy et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015;Suehiro et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Bera et al, 2018) or solvothermal (An et al, 2003;James et al, 2015;John et al, 2018) synthesis. Most notably, James et al achieved zT = 0.63 at 720 K for Cu 12 Sb 4 S 13 synthesized by the solvothermal method (James et al, 2015).…”
Section: Solution-phase Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good photostability of the composites mixed with Cu 2−x S improves carriers' separation and transfer efficiency [28,29]. Ternary copper-based compounds of Cu-Sb-S type materials are photovoltaic absorbers with good properties, and they are responsive in the visible light range, which has also received extensive attention [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%