Influence of regulatory focus on proactive waste separation behavior by urban residents’ mediating effect of anchoring breakthrough

Jin, Yujing; Chen, Feiyu; Chen, Hong; Long, Ruyin

doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102884

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, this has had no significant effect on improving the WSC. According to Jin et al, more than 60% of urban residents in China do not regularly separate their garbage [54]. Sz et al found that the infrastructure for garbage classification is problematic, and that the lack of service convenience significantly affects the behavior of residents in terms of separating waste [55].…”

Section: Technologies and Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Waste Supply Chain Coordination Barriers with Fuzzy MCDM

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The stability and efficiency of the waste supply chain (WSC) is related to the urban environment. This study constructed a framework of barriers to coordinating the WSC based on four perspectives: the costs and benefits, mechanisms involved, behaviors of the subjects, and technologies and standards used. We used an analytic network process based on the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to calculate the centrality and weight of each barrier factor, and we determined the critical barriers to coordination by combining their results. A causality diagram of the barriers was drawn, and a scheme of coordination of the WSC was designed based on a closed-loop supply chain around the critical barriers. The results show that contradictions in benefits between subjects, contradictions between economic and social benefits, excessive subsidies, the failure of the market mechanism, the lack of a mechanism for supervision, and blocked information and distrust among the subjects are the five most critical barriers to the coordination of the WSC, with excessive subsidies the root cause of the lack of coordination. The subsidy for direct waste disposal should be used to reduce the cost of the operation of the WSC, waste recycling should be improved, an information-sharing platform should be built, and the cost of recyclable waste for manufacturers should be reduced to improve the efficiency of the WSC.

show abstract

Section: Technologies and Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying Waste Supply Chain Coordination Barriers with Fuzzy MCDM

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At present, domestic waste management research is gradually being focused on by many scholars. In terms of research regions, previous scholars have looked more on urban domestic waste (Wang et al, 2019;Jin et al, 2021;Sun and Asari, 2023), neglecting the examination of rural residents' domestic waste separation (Xu et al, 2017;Knickmeyer, 2020;Zhou et al, 2022). In fact, in terms of urbanrural, solid waste has grown faster in rural areas than in county areas (Chen et al, 2023c).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The deviation of farmers’ willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation: a study on neighborhood effects and policy interventions

Chen,

Xing,

et al. 2024

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the perspective of combining informal and formal systems, this paper empirically explores the impact of neighborhood effects and policy interventions on the deviation of farmers’ willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation (DWS) by using data from the China Land Economy Survey (CLES) and constructing a probit model. It should be explained that the neighborhood effect in this paper refers to the fact that the behavior of farmers is highly susceptible to the behavior of their neighbors in the process of production and living. The results of the study show that neighborhood effects and policy interventions have a significant negative impact on the deviation of farmers’ willingness and behavior of DWS, respectively. Comparison of marginal effects shows that neighborhood effects > environmental advocacy > reward and punishment policies. From the interaction effects as a whole, neighborhood effects and policy interventions have complementary effects on the deviation of farmers’ willingness and behavior of DWS, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that neighborhood effects completely replace the inhibitory effect of policy interventions on the deviation of high-income farmers’ willingness and behavior of DWS, but have no effect on political elite farmers. The interaction between neighborhood effects and policy interventions has complementary effects on low-income farmers and ordinary farmers, with the complementary effects of neighborhood effects and environmental advocacy being more significant.

show abstract

Analysis of factors influencing waste separation behavior of Hanoi citizens with consideration to societal elements

Nguyen

Aramaki²

2022

J Mater Cycles Waste Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Influence of regulatory focus on proactive waste separation behavior by urban residents’ mediating effect of anchoring breakthrough

Cited by 12 publications

References 19 publications

Identifying Waste Supply Chain Coordination Barriers with Fuzzy MCDM

Identifying Waste Supply Chain Coordination Barriers with Fuzzy MCDM

The deviation of farmers’ willingness and behavior of domestic waste separation: a study on neighborhood effects and policy interventions

Analysis of factors influencing waste separation behavior of Hanoi citizens with consideration to societal elements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About