Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of class II glass ionomer restorations

Roeleveld, Alida C.; Amerongen, W.E. van; Mandari, G.J.

doi:10.1007/bf03320820

Cited by 56 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Two calibrated examiners carried out the evaluations. The evaluation was performed using Roeleveld et al 16 criteria. The width and depth of the marginal defects, surface wear and excess or lack of material were measured with the use of the CPI (Community Periodontal Index) periodontal probe, which has a ball tip with 0.5 mm diameter.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Good survival rates for single-surface Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations have been reported, while multi-surface ART restorations have not shown similar results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of occluso-proximal ART restorations using two different filling materials: Ketac Molar EasyMix (3M ESPE) and Vitro Molar (DFL). A total of 117 primary molars with occluso-proximal caries lesions were selected in 4 to 8 years old children in Barueri city, Brazil. Only one tooth was selected per child. The subjetcs were randomly allocated in two groups according to the filling material. All treatments were performed following the ART premises and all restorations were evaluated after 2, 6 and 12 months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for testing association with clinical factors (α = 5%). There was no difference in survival rate between the materials tested, (HR = 1.60, CI = 0.98-2.62, p = 0.058). The overall survival rate of restorations was 42.74% and the survival rate per group was Ketac Molar = 50,8% and Vitro Molar G2 = 34.5%). Cox regression test showed no association between the analyzed clinical variables and the success of the restorations. After 12 months evaluation, no difference in the survival rate of ART occluso-proximal restorations was found between tested materials.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As mentioned before, the high-viscous GIC is known as the material of choice when using the ART approach and has a drawback related to its consistency, which may lead to an incorrect insertion of the material in the cavity, resulting in cervical gaps and consequently jeopardizing the success of the restoration 7,8 . So, in an effort to overcome those problems, we performed this investigation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The high viscosity of the GIC is possibly responsible for the poor adaptation of this material especially in approximal cavities, leading to unsuccessful restorations 7,8 . So, in an attempt to overcome this problem, the bilayer technique for the insertion of the GIC was developed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bilayer technique and nano‐filled coating increase success of approximalARTrestorations: a randomized clinical trial

Hesse

Bonifácio

Guglielmi

et al. 2015

Int J Paed Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22 The study of Hevinga et al 23 revealed that the presence of residual caries under the restorations caused a significant decrease in fracture strength of the tooth restoration complex compared to the control group with complete excavation. Roeleveld et al 24 reported that the presence of residual caries combined with cervical gaps had a significant influence on the survival rate of class II glass ionomer restorations. In contrast, Bjorndal 25 indicated that if an excellent marginal adaptation is maintained, the presence of little remaining caries in the depth of the cavity may not cause a problem for short-term success of the restoration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Evaluation of DIAGNOdent and Caries Detector Dye in Detection of Residual Caries in Prepared Cavities

Akbari

Ahrari²,

Jafari³

2012

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The objective of this study was to determine the association between DIAGNOdent laser and caries detector dye in detection of the remaining caries in restorative cavities. Materials and methods:The sample consisted of 100 cavities prepared in patients referring to the Department of Restorative Dentistry of Mashhad Dental School. After confirming caries absence by tactile examination, the presence of any residual caries was determined by a laser fluorescence (LF) device (DIAGNOdent Pen) and then by caries detector dye. The data were analyzed through McNemar test.Results: When the cut off value was considered as 13, both DIAGNOdent Pen and caries detector dye found 54 cavities as without caries and 12 cavities as carious. There were 32 teeth diagnosed as decayed only by the dye and two cases that were diagnosed as having residual caries only by the DIAGNOdent. The McNemar test revealed a significant difference in the diagnosis of residual caries between the two methods (p < 0.05), as well as significant differences between each method and tactile examination (p < 0.05). When the cut off value was set at 25, no significant difference was found between laser fluorescence and tactile examination in residual caries detection (p > 0.05). Conclusion:Both DIAGNOdent Pen and caries detector dye can be considered as adjuncts for detecting residual caries in prepared cavities. However, the use of laser fluorescence device can provide results that are more consistent with tactile examination, while relying on caries detector dye may result in excessive removal of tooth tissue, and thus increase the risk of pulpal exposure.Clinical significance: Incomparision with caries detector dye, Residual caries detection by DIAGNOdent Pen is more consistent with tactile examination.

show abstract

Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of class II glass ionomer restorations

Cited by 56 publications

References 19 publications

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT

Bilayer technique and nano‐filled coating increase success of approximalARTrestorations: a randomized clinical trial

A Comparative Evaluation of DIAGNOdent and Caries Detector Dye in Detection of Residual Caries in Prepared Cavities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About