1996
DOI: 10.1002/srin.199605477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of roll geometry and strip width on flattening in flat rolling

Abstract: The size of local roll flattening and its distribution along the direction of the roll axis in flat rolling were calculated by means of 3‐dimensional finite element method. For analysis of elastic flattening deformation of the roll stack the well‐known classical and analytical solutions are usually employed which were derived from elastic half space theory or two dimensional contact theory. By comparison of results from both the different methods the validity of the classical formulae was examined. Some of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shifting and crossing mechanisms are modeled with the presented method by adjusting the model geometry and modifying the elastic foundation modulus accordingly. Roll bending is accommodated by providing corresponding load values to the forcing vector f. Although the analytical plane-strain and elastic half-space solutions for the flattening between rolls do not account for the length-to-diameter ratio of the rolls, nor for any specific axial loading position, these effects are accommodated by the elastic foundation moduli since they are indeed functions of axial position x. Zhou et al compared the classical analytical formulae for contact between rolls with three-dimensional finite element simulations using a traction boundary condition on a single roll (Zhou et al, 1996). They noted various differences between the FEM solutions and the classic solutions when studying the effects of strip width, roll diameter to length ratio, and rolling load intensity.…”
Section: Representation Of Strip Profile Control Devicesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Shifting and crossing mechanisms are modeled with the presented method by adjusting the model geometry and modifying the elastic foundation modulus accordingly. Roll bending is accommodated by providing corresponding load values to the forcing vector f. Although the analytical plane-strain and elastic half-space solutions for the flattening between rolls do not account for the length-to-diameter ratio of the rolls, nor for any specific axial loading position, these effects are accommodated by the elastic foundation moduli since they are indeed functions of axial position x. Zhou et al compared the classical analytical formulae for contact between rolls with three-dimensional finite element simulations using a traction boundary condition on a single roll (Zhou et al, 1996). They noted various differences between the FEM solutions and the classic solutions when studying the effects of strip width, roll diameter to length ratio, and rolling load intensity.…”
Section: Representation Of Strip Profile Control Devicesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Then, the mechanics of the cold strip rolling was analyzed based on the model. Zhou et al [21,22] [23][24][25][26][27] analyzed the error of semi-infinite body model in roll calculation and proposed an analytical model in flat rolling by boundary integral equation method. Wang et al [28] used the 3-D elastic-plastic FEM to simulate the thin strip rolling process of UCM cold rolling mill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some new technologies such as schedule free rolling [1][2][3][4][5][6] and strip profile controlling [7], were applied in the field of hot strip steel rolling production. With the further improvement and widely application of Automation Gauge Control [8], the strip gauge control has reached a high level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%