2023
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences13110326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Root Reinforcement on Shallow Landslide Distribution: A Case Study in Garfagnana (Northern Tuscany, Italy)

Lorenzo Marzini,
Enrico D’Addario,
Michele Pio Papasidero
et al.

Abstract: In this work, we evaluated the influence of root structure on shallow landslide distribution. Root density measurements were acquired in the field and the corresponding root cohesion was estimated. Data were acquired from 150 hillslope deposit trenches dug in areas either devoid or affected by shallow landslides within the Garfagnana Valley (northern Tuscany, Italy). Results highlighted a correlation between the root reinforcement and the location of measurement sites. Namely, lower root density was detected w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 84 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As already pointed out in other research [26,[45][46][47][48], RAR values have much variability depending on soil, depth, species, and local climatic conditions; in general, RAR decreases as depth increases [48,49]. As general considerations on vegetation root system monitoring techniques, it is also necessary to specify the limitations of these techniques, which would also need to be applied to other case studies and for other types of SWBE interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already pointed out in other research [26,[45][46][47][48], RAR values have much variability depending on soil, depth, species, and local climatic conditions; in general, RAR decreases as depth increases [48,49]. As general considerations on vegetation root system monitoring techniques, it is also necessary to specify the limitations of these techniques, which would also need to be applied to other case studies and for other types of SWBE interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%