2020
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci14626-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Rootstocks on Leaf Mineral Content in the Subtropical Peach cv. UFSun

Abstract: The rootstock is an essential element for orchard management, influencing scion growth, nutrient concentration, and fruit quality. Seasonal variations in leaf nutrients of ‘UFSun’ grafted on five different rootstocks (‘Flordaguard’, ‘Barton’, ‘MP-29’, ‘P-22’, and ‘Okinawa’) were investigated during the 2017–18 growing season in Citra, FL. There was no significant variation in the macronutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Mg, Ca, and S) among different rootstocks; however, ‘UFSun’ on ‘Okinawa’ and ‘Flordag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimal soil nutrient levels have not been determined for peach, but were uniform along the slope gradient and sufficient for citrus plant growth according to UF/IFAS recommendations in both years (Morgan et al, 2019; data not shown but will be available online at the UF dissertation repository in 2021). Leaf nutrient levels were adequate for optimum production (Johnson, 2008), similar to other leaf nutrient analysis of peach grown in Florida (Shahkoomahally et al, 2020), and did not differ between whole plot bagging treatment levels (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Optimal soil nutrient levels have not been determined for peach, but were uniform along the slope gradient and sufficient for citrus plant growth according to UF/IFAS recommendations in both years (Morgan et al, 2019; data not shown but will be available online at the UF dissertation repository in 2021). Leaf nutrient levels were adequate for optimum production (Johnson, 2008), similar to other leaf nutrient analysis of peach grown in Florida (Shahkoomahally et al, 2020), and did not differ between whole plot bagging treatment levels (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It is believed that dwarfing rootstocks are less efficient in absorbing nutrients from the soil, especially some macronutrients, due to their restricted root volume and narrow xylem vessels (Zarrouk et al, 2005;Mestre et al, 2015;Ben Yahmed et al, 2020;Shahkoomahally et al, 2020). In the present experiment 'RP20' was the most dwarfing rootstock, with the rest of the rootstocks are considered invigorating ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The differences observed among rootstocks regarding leaf nutrient concentration of the budded cultivar are attributed to various factors. According to some authors, the final concentration of the nutrient in the leaves depends on the absorption, transportation, redistribution, and use of this nutrient (Jimenes et al, 2018;Shahkoomahally et al, 2020). Since rootstock is the plant part responsible for the absorption and transportation (to some extend) of the nutrient, any rootstock property influencing these two functions (root volume, root morphology, root xylem vessel characteristics), may have a significant effect on nutrient concentration found in the leaves (Meland, 2010;Mestre et al, 2015;Mestre et al, 2017;Ben Yahmed et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations