2008
DOI: 10.1080/00387010802286692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Roughness Surfaces on Third-Order Nonlinear-Optical Properties of Erbium-Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it was noted, hydrothermally grown samples have been exposed to laser beams with the intensity of 3.98 9 10 6 W/m 2 , which is * 10 times lower than the irradiation intensity on the nanostructures presented in Table 3 (1.25 9 10 7 W/m 2 ). The current data could also be comparable with that measured for erbium-doped zinc oxide thin films at wavelength of 1064 nm using the third harmonic generation (THG), showing a third-order nonlinear susceptibility of * 10 3 times higher than those estimated in the current study [73]. Many reports have been published focusing on nonlinearities of ZnO nanostructures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…As it was noted, hydrothermally grown samples have been exposed to laser beams with the intensity of 3.98 9 10 6 W/m 2 , which is * 10 times lower than the irradiation intensity on the nanostructures presented in Table 3 (1.25 9 10 7 W/m 2 ). The current data could also be comparable with that measured for erbium-doped zinc oxide thin films at wavelength of 1064 nm using the third harmonic generation (THG), showing a third-order nonlinear susceptibility of * 10 3 times higher than those estimated in the current study [73]. Many reports have been published focusing on nonlinearities of ZnO nanostructures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[46] These semi-empirical formulae were extensively evaluated and found to be accurate (based on experimental data) in determining the 𝜒 3 for oxide materials. [47] The Ticha and Tichy approach was used in our work, which incorporated the Miller generalized rule: 𝜒 3 = A (𝜒 1 ) 4 , A = 10 −10 a constant, [48] and the low-frequency linear refractive index (dispersion in the visible and near-infrared spectral bands) deduced from the Wemple-DiDomenico, WDD, model. [49] Hence, based on the WDD model, the linear refractive index, n, is: With, E 0 the electronic transitions strength; E d the dispersion energy.…”
Section: Nonlinear Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On numerous times and occasions, the effect of roughness on the value of 𝜒 3 has been researched on multiple oxides such as zinc oxide, [45] indium oxide, [52] tin oxide, [53] and others. Thus, Addou et al, [54] Lamrani et al, [47,55] they have found and determined that the smoothest surfaces plus a good crystallinity have the highest third-order susceptibility. Which is in good agreement with our findings, where the Co:Mn 3 O 4 (2 at%) has a good crystallinity presented in the XRD and Raman results (Table 1 and Table 2) as for the roughness is less than the Co:Mn 3 O 4 (4 at%) and slightly higher than undoped Mn 3 O 4 caused by the cobalt substitution effect which is quiet normal (Table 3).…”
Section: Nonlinear Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would assume that only from thicknesses on the order of several skin depths surface and bulk become well distinguishable. The strong influence of the surface roughness on SHG and THG has in fact been shown. We thus suspect that our observed “spike-like” additional signals are caused by the sudden increase in surface roughness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%