1974
DOI: 10.1139/f74-132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Salinity on Protein Requirements of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Smolts

Abstract: Six purified diets ranging from 30 to 55% protein in 5% increments were fed for 10 wk to duplicate groups of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) smolts maintained at 10 or 20‰ salinity. The data indicated that minimum protein requirements did not differ for fish at either salinity, and weight gain and protein retention levelled off after 40% protein in the diet was reached. Salinity had a minor effect on the criteria measured whereas the different dietary protein concentrations were of major consequence. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the discrepancy results from strain differences in Arctic charr nutrient needs, as previously described by Tabachek (1984), because her estimates of protein requirements were obtained with Nauyuk Lake charr while we used the Labrador strain and Jobling & Wandsvik (1983a) used a Norwegian strain. Our estimates of protein requirement and those of Jobling & Wandsvik (1983a) are gener-ally similar to the 400 g kg-' value reported for chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum) (Delong et al 1958), coho salmon, 0. kisutch (Walbaum) (Zeitoun et al 1974) and rainbow trout (Satia 1974) but lower than the value of 450g kg-' reported for Atlantic salmon (La11 & Bishop 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It is possible that the discrepancy results from strain differences in Arctic charr nutrient needs, as previously described by Tabachek (1984), because her estimates of protein requirements were obtained with Nauyuk Lake charr while we used the Labrador strain and Jobling & Wandsvik (1983a) used a Norwegian strain. Our estimates of protein requirement and those of Jobling & Wandsvik (1983a) are gener-ally similar to the 400 g kg-' value reported for chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum) (Delong et al 1958), coho salmon, 0. kisutch (Walbaum) (Zeitoun et al 1974) and rainbow trout (Satia 1974) but lower than the value of 450g kg-' reported for Atlantic salmon (La11 & Bishop 1977).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some studies have shown that protein requirements of fish were increased or not affected by salinity (Zeitoun et al . 1973, 1974). These differences may be because of the differences in the nature of fish species, dietary protein level ranges and energy sources, culture surroundings, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the eect of salinity on protein requirements for ®sh is still unclear (Tacon & Cowey 1985) and there is not enough data demonstrating that protein requirements are aected by salinity. Some studies have shown that protein requirements of ®sh were increased or not aected by salinity (Zeitoun et al 1973(Zeitoun et al , 1974. These dierences may be because of the dierences in the nature of ®sh species, dietary protein level ranges and energy sources, culture surroundings, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best growth and feed efficiencies were noted at a salinity of 8 ppt (Jurss et ak 1985). The works of Shaw et al (1975) on the Atlantic salmon led to conclusions similar to those of Zeitoun et al (1973Zeitoun et al ( , 1974 except that at salinities above 29 ppt, the maintenance needs were increased. This salinity of 29 ppt seems to be a critical level for rainbow trout beyond which significant changes within the intracellular pools occur.…”
Section: Nutrient Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Zeitoun et al (1973Zeitoun et al ( , 1974 observed only slight differences in the protein requirements of rainbow trout and coho salmon at salinities of either 10 or 20 ppt. Lall and Bishop (1979) showed that protein and lipid utilization in rainbow trout adapted to fresh water and sea water differed and concluded that the protein requirement was higher in the latter.…”
Section: Nutrient Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 96%