1985
DOI: 10.2307/3801388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sampling Interval on Estimates of Home-Range Size

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Allen Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Wildlife Management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
209
3
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
209
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some telemetry techniques can also suffer this limitation, whereby trajectories are largely dependent on the time interval between readings (Swihart and Slade, 1985;Spencer et al, 1990). Therefore in all movement studies, a time component must be explicitly stated, for instance, the frequency of observations and the duration of the study (e.g.…”
Section: Juveniles and Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some telemetry techniques can also suffer this limitation, whereby trajectories are largely dependent on the time interval between readings (Swihart and Slade, 1985;Spencer et al, 1990). Therefore in all movement studies, a time component must be explicitly stated, for instance, the frequency of observations and the duration of the study (e.g.…”
Section: Juveniles and Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clapper rail locations were recorded using a handheld Global Positioning System (Garmin Corporation, Olathe, Kansas, USA). To minimize spatial and temporal autocorrelation of animal locations (Swihart and Slade 1985), only one location was taken per bird per high or low tide and a minimum of 12 h was allowed between consecutive locations for any given rail. This allowed a tidal event to occur which influences the birds movement, thus assuring locational independence of consecutive points.…”
Section: Home Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation procedure has been problematic because of three factors: (1) the distribution is two-dimensional, (2) observed utilization distributions rarely conform to parametric models, and (3) observations are sequential locations of an individual animal and often may not be independent observations of the true distribution (Swihart and Slade 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%