1997
DOI: 10.1116/1.589748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of secondary electrons in proximal probe lithography

Abstract: This article describes the limitations of proximal probe lithography due to electrons that are mirrored by the electric field between the tip and the surface. The incident beam generates two kinds of electrons at the sample surface: primary electrons which are elastically backscattered and secondary electrons which are produced in the resist/substrate system. The electric field confines the electrons emanating from the surface. The electron trajectories are bent in such a way that the electrons impinge on the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19͑a͔͒. 95 The most significant change is in the total yield of emitted electrons, which increases sharply to a maximum with increasing PE energy, after which it slowly decreases ͓see Fig. 19͑b͔͒.…”
Section: B Electron Energymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19͑a͔͒. 95 The most significant change is in the total yield of emitted electrons, which increases sharply to a maximum with increasing PE energy, after which it slowly decreases ͓see Fig. 19͑b͔͒.…”
Section: B Electron Energymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proximity effects in e-beam lithography such as backscattered electrons 6 are absent in HDL. Since HDL is typically performed below 10 V, secondary electron production and backscattering are minimized, eliminating these e-beam lithography proximity effects, although backscattered electron effects have been observed for HDL above 20 V. 7,8 However, the presence of the tip does introduce an additional proximity effect in HDL not typically seen in e-beam lithography: production of DBs due to the presence of hydrogen atoms nominally liberated from the surface. This is a resist-induced proximity effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Firstly, the secondary electron yield for 35 keV He + ions impinging perpendicularly on a Au substrate is calculated by the software package IONiSE to be about 2.7 [26]. And this is approximately three times higher than the experimentally determined secondary electron yield (approximately 0.85) for 100 eV electrons [27]. Secondly, the energy spectrum of secondary electrons excited by 35 keV He + ions on Au showed a peak around 2 eV, with a small shoulder in the range of 5–6 eV [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%