2016
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of seismicity level and height of the building on progressive collapse resistance of steel frames

Abstract: Influences of building height and seismicity level on progressive collapse resistance of buildings are investigated in this paper. For the height, 4-story, 8-story and 12-story steel special moment resisting frames are focused. The obtained results indicate that taller buildings are safer against progressive collapse. To study the influence of seismicity level, different four-story structures having special moment resisting frame systems are designed for different levels of seismicity, namely, very high, high,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, the effects of building height, seismicity level of site and severity of building irregularity on the progressive collapse potential were evaluated together, while in some references [17] only the parameters of the seismicity level of site and building height were discussed. Furthermore, this paper proved that both the parameters of resistance to earthquake and irregularity of structures have positive effects on mitigating progressive collapse potential, and these parameters should be evaluated together.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this research, the effects of building height, seismicity level of site and severity of building irregularity on the progressive collapse potential were evaluated together, while in some references [17] only the parameters of the seismicity level of site and building height were discussed. Furthermore, this paper proved that both the parameters of resistance to earthquake and irregularity of structures have positive effects on mitigating progressive collapse potential, and these parameters should be evaluated together.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because each building in everywhere has its own site seismicity level and irregularity specification and considering only one parameter from the two results in an incomplete evaluation. Nevertheless, many references [12, 16, 17, 18] evaluated only one parameter solely. Meanwhile, finding of this research in contrast with some references [18, 19] proved that irregularity of building increases the resistance to progressive collapse phenomenon, because in this research equivalent-designed buildings with and without irregularity were compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recent events occurring in the United States [5,6] indicate that the civil engineering structures are under increasingly complicated surrounding conditions. Therefore, how to reduce the risk of progressive collapse of structures has gained increasing popularity among researchers and engineers [1][2][3][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSA |]N |m}D=DU= VwQ T=U= Q@ xDiQo CQwY p}rLD w [2] 'OvOQm |UQQ@ xrRrR Q@=Q@ wkw |= Q@ |tm p}Uv=DB '|UQQ@ OQwt u=tDN=U xm O=O u=Wv GSA |O=yvW}B |=yQ=}at xm CU= xO=O u=Wv Q}N= VywSB G}=Dv u}vJty "OQ=O xOvwQV}B |@=QN QO O}=@ |]NQ}e p}rLD VwQ wO QO '|@= QN Q@=Q@ QO Ctw=kt u}tND |= Q@ |Dw=iDt |L=Q] |=yxR=U xm OvO=O u=Wv R}v 2017 |OtLt w d=@OQm "OwW xDiQo Q_v xH}Dv w OQ=O |QDW}@ |xOvwQV}B |@=QN Ctw=kt 'QDq=@ |}xRQr |x}=B VQ@ =@ xOW p@=k |L=Q] |x}=B VQ@ Q}F -=D 'hrDNt |=yp=YD=`=wv= OQ@Q=m =@ |DL xm OvDiQo Q}D jta V}=Ri= =@ p=YD= Ctw=kt w |Q}PBpmW xm O=O u=Wv 2007 p} w=Dr= w Q= Qk Q}F -=D CLD COWx@ |}=yv Ctw=kt x@ uOW |Q=H Ctw=kt C@Uv V}=Ri= w [12] "OQ=O |QFwt Vkv uwDU x@ Q}D p=@ p=YD= C=}RH u}vJty "OQ}o|t Q@=Q@ QO = Q |Oqwi O}OH p=YD= l} OQmrta R}v 2016 u= Q=mty w QytO} Qi w OvOQm |UQQ@ |OOa w |@ QHD CQwYx@ xOvwQV}B |@=QN w |}xRQr |Q=PoQ=@ |WNQJ C}iQ_ x@ |@=}CUO x@ QO=k xOW O=yvW}B O}OH p=YD= xm OvDiQo xH}Dv |r=a Q=DiQ 'u}= Q@ xwqa "CU= p=YD= Q}D u=UWm pt=m C}iQ_ |xaUwD w ?U=vt [13] [11] [22] "OW=@ Q=PoQ}F -=D |Q}tN pYit p}mWD QO =yuwDU hPL u}@ |v=tR |xrY=i xm CU= xOW xO=O u=Wv uwDU OvJ |@}DQD hPL w OQ=Po|t Q}F -=D |Wv=Qo |=yQ=@ |Oa@xU`}RwDR=@ |Q=PoQ=@ QO |yHwD p@=k Qw]x@ Q[=L Q=DWwv QO [23] "OQm xHwD x}rw= O}OW ? }U; x@ O}=@ '|UQQ@ OQwt |=yxvwtv QO C}akwt x@ xDU@=w , =U=U= xOvwQV}B |@=QN Q@=Q@ QO =yxR=U OQmrta [3] "CU= xHwD u}@ QO u}W}B |xar=]t T=U= Q@ "CU= |@v=H Q@ Q=@ sDU}U`wv w uwDU hPL x= Qty x@ xS}w |WtN ?=k sDU}U '|Oqwi Kr=Yt`wv R= |}xR=U |=ysDU}U u=}@ 2014 |v=U=U w |rew=Q}eY u}vJty [4] "OQ=O |QDQ@ 'QwLtuwQ@ Ov@ Q=yt x@ |oDU@ xR=U x@ xOW p}tLD |a[wt ? }U; R= |W=v =yQ=@`} RwDR=@ xm OvOQm [5] "OQ=O xR=U |SQv= lqyDU= w pmWQ}}eD C}iQ_ w '|v}at=v '|oDUw}B 'Ctw=kt |Q}PBpmW =@ |vD@ |=yu=tDN=U xm OvO=O u=Wv R}v 2016 QwB hUw} w =}vT=@a C@Uv xOvwQV}B |@=QN |xO}OB QO |}xRQr ?U=vt Q=}U@ OQmrta seQ|ra O=}R u= Q=mty w |Q=vJ=B u}vJty [6] [11] [30] "CU= xOWu}}aD xOy=Wt 4 pmW QO =yxQo R= |m} |= Q@ u=tR |}=Hx@=H Q=Owtv |xU}=kt QO hwPLt |=yxQo s=k Q=oOv=t |}=Hx@=H w |}=Hx@=H |xv}W}@ u}vJty "OwW|t [28] [28] '2013 uRU w nv=U Q=DWwv QO |HvUCLY pOt w [28]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%