29th Annual Meeting North American Skull Base Society 2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Selection Bias in Survey Studies Derived from a Patient-Focused Organization: A Comparison of Response Data from a Single Tertiary Care Center and the Acoustic Neuroma Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations associated with ANA PANQOL data sets have been previously characterized by Prummer and colleagues. 18 Primarily, ANA cohorts demonstrate a skew toward significantly lower scores across all subdomains compared to institutional cohorts. Furthermore, all data, including treatment modality and tumor size, were self-reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Limitations associated with ANA PANQOL data sets have been previously characterized by Prummer and colleagues. 18 Primarily, ANA cohorts demonstrate a skew toward significantly lower scores across all subdomains compared to institutional cohorts. Furthermore, all data, including treatment modality and tumor size, were self-reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is plausible to consider that patients with either poor or excellent outcomes may be more inclined to participate in these types of nonprofit organization. In other words, one could conceive that an organization focused on patient advocacy and support might disproportionately attract patients with outcomes or treatment courses that deviate from the average VS patient experience …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the promising results achieved in this study, the proposed ANN model should be tested on a general VS population rather than a survey‐based ANA respondent population. It has been shown that inherent limitations and biases (ie, participation bias) are associated with survey studies from national patient support organizations such as ANA . Prummer et al showed that the population profile of ANA survey respondents likely differs significantly from the greater population of VS patients that may be encountered at a tertiary referral center .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the two studies reporting on QOL in members of local AN associations, Prummer et al [24] report that members were younger, had larger tumours, included more women, were more likely to have had surgery or radiation, and to report symptoms (hearing loss, tinnitus, dizziness, headache, facial paralysis) than non-members. As would then be expected, members had significantly lower scores on the PANQOL.…”
Section: Links To Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%