1953
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1953.174.1.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sensory Neurons Isolated From Central Nervous System on Maintenance of Taste Buds and Regeneration of Barbels in the Catfish, Ameiurus nebulosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1954
1954
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An uninterrupted connection to the taste buds is necessary for their maintenance and function (cf. Similar conclusions were drawn by Kamrin and Singer (1953) from data in catfish and by Zalewski in the rat (1969). However, an uninterrupted connection with the brain is not necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An uninterrupted connection to the taste buds is necessary for their maintenance and function (cf. Similar conclusions were drawn by Kamrin and Singer (1953) from data in catfish and by Zalewski in the rat (1969). However, an uninterrupted connection with the brain is not necessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Interruption of the axons between CNS and the ganglion will not cause their disappearance, though of course it will abolish the ability of the animal to sense taste. Similar conclusions were drawn by Kamrin and Singer (1953) from data in catfish and by Zalewski in the rat (1969). The results do not allow conclusions on the type of substance that is transported but it seems evident from other studies (Zalewski 1968, 1970, Farbman 1972) that the cell bodies of the taste neurons synthesize a special type of substance either this synthesis occurs under the influence of some factor produced in the epithelium of the tongue and transported to the nerve cell bodies (Zalewski 1973) or is synthesized independant of the periphery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Likewise, most (75%) of these latter studies examined the 1-5 week postoperative interval. Some authors account for the scant buds remaining during the degenerative period either as midline-region buds receiving contralateral innervation (e.g., Cheal and Oakley, 1977;Hayes and Elliott, 1942;Guth, 1958;State et al, 1982;Whiteside, 1927) or by the incompleteness of Wallerian degeneration in the sectioned nerve (e.g., Kamrin and Singer, 1953) or by the coincidental occurrence of regeneration when nerve regrowth could not be ruled out (e.g., . In addition, of ten studies reporting presence of buds or bud cells (Cheal and Oakley, 1977;Chelyshev et al, 1982;Farbman, 1969;Fujimoto and Murray, 1970;Kennedy, 1972;Krol and Dubbeldam, 1979;Olmsted, 1921Olmsted, ,1922Sloan et al, 1983;Whitehead et al, 1985), nine examined tissue between 1 and 15 postoperative days, which may be early for complete degeneration to have occurred, under their experimental conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the stimulation increased the utilization of the existing neurohumoral factor and thus com pelled an earlier breakdown and elimination of dependent sense organs. Kamarin and Singer [1953] reported that nerve transection proximal to the cell body did not result in degeneration of taste buds. They pointed out that the neurohumoral substance was formed by the cell body from which it passed through the axons to the nerve terminals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%