Influence of several fibre‐reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth

Akman, Serhan; Akman, Melek; Eskitaşçıoğlu, Gürcan; Bellí, Sema

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01843.x

Cited by 39 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, it has been reported that placing a Ribbond on the occlusal surface could increase the fracture resistance of premolars with MOD cavity 13) . Another study demonstrated that anterior teeth restored with a Ribbond inside a root canal achieve a higher resistance strength to fracture 16) . It is thought that combined FRC and dentin as a whole, therefore, if a load force is applied to the sample, the fiber would absorb it and reduce the risk of fracture as the intact tooth 12,16) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another study demonstrated that anterior teeth restored with a Ribbond inside a root canal achieve a higher resistance strength to fracture 16) . It is thought that combined FRC and dentin as a whole, therefore, if a load force is applied to the sample, the fiber would absorb it and reduce the risk of fracture as the intact tooth 12,16) . During normal function, the cusps of the opposing tooth exert a wedding effect that pushes the B and L cusps apart.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Steele and Johnson reported that the mean fracture strength for unrestored teeth with MOD preparation was 50% weaker than that of unaltered premolar teeth 18) . Additionally, an MOD cavity preparation in a root-filled tooth may cause cuspal fracture 15,16) . As the palatal cusps of teeth fracture, the severely destroyed teeth is usually recommended to be restored by post-core techniques.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…With the development of new materials and technology, new approaches can be implemented when faced with some of these cases to complement traditional methods. Only some studies have investigated the effects of fiber post, direct composite resin or FRC-restored on root-filled treated premolars with MOD cavity 15,16) . Furthermore, few studies have evaluated the fracture strength of teeth restored with fiber post combined with a fiber ribbon.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Fracture resistance of palatal cusps defective premolars restored with polyethylene fiber and composite resin

Miao

Liu

Lee

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fracture resistance of palatal cusps defective premolars restored with polyethylene fiber and composite resin

Miao

Liu

Lee

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Deep endodontic access preparation in the MOD cavity has been found to increase cuspal deflection significantly [50]. Akman et al (2011) [72] reported that fiber-reinforced composite restorations decrease cusp movement in molar teeth with MOD and endodontic access cavities. As a result, fiber reinforcement of composite resin restorations with polyethylene or glass fiber material is a well-accepted method for saving the remaining tooth structure while performing direct composite restorations in root-filled teeth.…”

Section: Fiber-reinforced Composite Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: a Brief Summary of Materials and Techniques

Bellí

Eraslan

Eskitaşçıoğlu

2015

Curr Oral Health Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth remains a challenge. The success of the final restoration depends mostly on the structure of the remaining tooth. Although the materials and procedures available today result in successful restoration of root-filled teeth via direct (in situ) techniques, one should first consider the amount of the coronal tooth structure remaining as well as the functional requirements. Restoration using direct composite resin is a good treatment option, but polymerization shrinkage is one of the major limitations of this material. The application of various base materials under the composite resin is an effective method. Covering the cusps with the restorative material is another option to save the remaining tooth structure; however, some materials may be unsuitable in stress-bearing areas. Materials applied to the orifice of a root canal also have a major effect on tooth biomechanics. This article reviews the direct restoration of endodontically treated teeth and discusses the current materials and techniques used for this purpose.

show abstract

Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites

Fráter

Lassila

Braunitzer³

et al. 2019

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim was to explore the fracture behavior and marginal gap within the root canal of endodontically treated (ET) premolars restored with different fiber-reinforced post-core composites (FRCs). Further aim was to evaluate the composite curing at different depths in the canal. Materials and methods Eighty-seven intact upper premolars were collected and randomly divided into six groups. After endodontic procedure, standard MOD cavities were prepared and restored with their respective fiber-reinforced post-core materials: group 1: prefabricated unidirectional FRC-post + conventional composite core; group 2: prefabricated unidirectional FRC-post + short fiber composite (SFRC) core; group 3: individually formed unidirectional FRC-post + conventional composite core; group 4: randomly oriented SFRC directly layered as post and core; group 5: individually formed unidirectional FRC + randomly oriented SFRC as post and core. After restorations were completed, teeth (n = 3/group) were sectioned and then stained. Specimens were viewed under a stereo microscope and the percentage of microgaps within the root canal was calculated. Fracture load was measured using universal testing machine. Results SFRC application in the root canal (groups 4 and 5) showed significantly higher fracture load (876.7 N) compared to the other tested groups (512-613 N) (p < 0.05). Post/core restorations made from prefabricated FRC-post (group 1) exhibited the highest number of microgaps (35.1%) at the examined interphase in the root canal. Conclusions The restoration of ET premolars with the use of SFRC as post-core material displayed promising performance in matter of microgap and load-bearing capacity. Clinical significance Fracture resistance of ET premolar restored by bilayered composite restoration that includes both SFRC as post-core material and surface conventional resin seems to be beneficial.

show abstract

Influence of several fibre‐reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth

Abstract: Regardless of restoration technique, fibre reinforcement of composite restorations decreased cusp movement in molar teeth with MOD and endodontic access cavities but did not affect fracture strength.

Cited by 39 publications

References 42 publications

Fracture resistance of palatal cusps defective premolars restored with polyethylene fiber and composite resin

Fracture resistance of palatal cusps defective premolars restored with polyethylene fiber and composite resin

Direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: a Brief Summary of Materials and Techniques

Fracture resistance and marginal gap formation of post-core restorations: influence of different fiber-reinforced composites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About