ObjectivesTo evaluate the complementary mechanical properties of dental ceramics using edge chipping resistance (Rea) and flexural strength before and after thermomechanical aging.Material and MethodsComputer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing of ceramic materials, including zirconia (ZR), lithium disilicate (LS2), and resin nanoceramics (RNC), were evaluated. Specimens for flexural strength testing were fabricated with dimensions of 3 × 4 × 25 mm, with 30 specimens per group. For the edge chipping test (ECT), specimens were fabricated with dimensions of 3 × 4 × 12 mm, with 48 specimens per group. Half of the specimens for both tests were subjected to thermomechanical aging for 200,000 cycles at 50 N. A Weibull analysis was performed to determine flexural strength. Fractographic analysis was performed before and after thermomechanical aging during the ECT. X‐ray diffractometry (XRD) was performed on the ZR specimens before and after thermomechanical aging. Flexural strength was analyzed using a two‐way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a t‐test, and Rea was analyzed using Pearson correlation and a two‐way repeated ANOVA.ResultsThe flexural strength and Rea differed according to the material (p = 0.001), whereas they were similar before and after thermomechanical aging (p > 0.05). The Weibull modulus of the flexural strength decreased after thermomechanical aging. In the fractographic analysis of the ECT, more than two fracture origins were identified after thermomechanical aging. The XRD analysis of ZR showed an increased monoclinic phase after thermomechanical aging.ConclusionAll the materials met the ISO 6872 standards for bending test. However, LS2 and RNC show low edge chipping resistance within the range of the occlusal force. The thermomechanical aging did not significantly alter the mechanical properties of the materials. However, the Weibull coefficients of the flexural strength decreased, and an additional origin of fracture appeared after thermomechanical aging.SignificanceFlexural strength and Rea differed depending on the material used. The probability of the material fracture increased after thermomechanical aging. To understand ceramic fractures, two mechanical tests and thermomechanical aging must be performed together.
