2016
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Skeletal and Local Bone Density on Dental Implant Stability in Patients with Osteoporosis

Abstract: Implant stability seems to be influenced by both local and skeletal bone densities. The lower stability scores in patient with skeletal osteoporosis reinforce the recommendations that safe protocols and longer healing times could be recommended when treating those patients with dental implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Osteoporosis may represent a risk for the osseointegration of endosseous implants [68] as bone may be too rarefied to offer good implant primary stability, one of the pre-requisites for osseointegration [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoporosis may represent a risk for the osseointegration of endosseous implants [68] as bone may be too rarefied to offer good implant primary stability, one of the pre-requisites for osseointegration [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoporosis, characterised by low bone mass and bone deterioration, increases bone fragility and the risk of fracture12. Sex hormones are crucial for maintaining bone mass, and the lack of oestrogen decreases bone mass and increases the risk of osteoporosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous investigations by this same group 17,18 and other groups, 14,15,19 the relationship between implant stability and different bone and implants variables has been assessed and a correlation already estab- In the scope of those same concerns about the variability of bone density over minute distances, the use of stereolithographical guides offers a greater precision of measurement by allowing a more reliable transcription of implant position but also, depth of insertion, direction, and inclination. This method offers a significantly more accurate planning of the implants locations than the method used previously by our group and which relied on a photographical superposition of radiographs and/or intra oral photographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%