2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of social support on cognitive reappraisal in young adults elevated on neuroticism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, while EF abilities decline across adulthood (Hedden & Gabrieli, 2004), social resources remain relatively accessible (and in some ways improve) among older adults, as evidenced by a smaller but closer social network relative to younger adults (Lang & Carstensen, 1994). Importantly, the availability of social support promotes reappraisal by affording opportunities to draw upon others’ expertise in reframing distressing events that may otherwise diminish cognitive resources and render the generation of alternative reinterpretations particularly challenging for the regulator (Metts & Craske, 2023; Sachs-Ericsson et al, 2021; Zaki & Williams, 2013). Relatedly, age-related prioritization of emotional goals, as posited by the socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al, 2003), may influence the appraisal and reappraisal of negative events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while EF abilities decline across adulthood (Hedden & Gabrieli, 2004), social resources remain relatively accessible (and in some ways improve) among older adults, as evidenced by a smaller but closer social network relative to younger adults (Lang & Carstensen, 1994). Importantly, the availability of social support promotes reappraisal by affording opportunities to draw upon others’ expertise in reframing distressing events that may otherwise diminish cognitive resources and render the generation of alternative reinterpretations particularly challenging for the regulator (Metts & Craske, 2023; Sachs-Ericsson et al, 2021; Zaki & Williams, 2013). Relatedly, age-related prioritization of emotional goals, as posited by the socioemotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al, 2003), may influence the appraisal and reappraisal of negative events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%