2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11842-021-09483-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Socio-Technological Factors on Smallholder Farmers’ Choices of Agroforestry Technologies in the Eastern Highlands of Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Agroforestry digital decision aids, tools or applications can help planners and managers with design and management -but they are often not easy to use or understand. Seen the innovative nature of both digital farm technologies and agroforestry with its diversity in structure and products, there is very little known about the choice of digital agroforestry technologies by farmers, in particular in Europe (Kalanzi et al 2021;Van Cauwenberghe et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Agroforestry digital decision aids, tools or applications can help planners and managers with design and management -but they are often not easy to use or understand. Seen the innovative nature of both digital farm technologies and agroforestry with its diversity in structure and products, there is very little known about the choice of digital agroforestry technologies by farmers, in particular in Europe (Kalanzi et al 2021;Van Cauwenberghe et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For small-scale farmers, achieving advanced production technology and specialization is a crucial pathway towards scaling management practices, adopting green production technologies, and promoting sustainable development and modernization in agriculture. Current academic research on agricultural socialization services primarily encompasses the construction of its system model, guidance in land scaling management [18], the promotion of improvements in agricultural technical efficiency and production efficiency [19], and the crucial linkage between small farmers and modern agriculture [20]. Moreover, several scholars have investigated the effects of agricultural socialization services on farmers' green production practices [2], including the adoption of reduced fertilizer use and biopesticide technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Economic functions: diversified crop production and associated increase in household income should crops be sold (Duffy et al, 2021), fodder (i.e., animal feed) reducing expenditure if it is grown on site (Brown et al, 2018). -Social functions: time efficient on-farm firewood collection (Regmi, 2003), shade for animals/people (Meybeck et al, 2021), field boundary delimitation (Kalanzi et al, 2021). -Environmental functions: windbreak for crops (Kalanzi et al, 2021), soil fertility and soil structural improvements, reduced erosion and improved water holding capacity (Franzel et al, 2014;Altieri et al, 2015;Nyasimi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Social functions: time efficient on-farm firewood collection (Regmi, 2003), shade for animals/people (Meybeck et al, 2021), field boundary delimitation (Kalanzi et al, 2021). -Environmental functions: windbreak for crops (Kalanzi et al, 2021), soil fertility and soil structural improvements, reduced erosion and improved water holding capacity (Franzel et al, 2014;Altieri et al, 2015;Nyasimi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%