Influence of sowing and harvest dates on production of two different cultivars of sugar beet

Pavlů, Klára; Chochola, J.; Pulkrábek, J.; Urban, J.

doi:10.17221/614/2016-pse

Cited by 13 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(sucrose%), SR% (sugar recovery%) and QZ (quality index%) were obtained in sugar beet roots harvested later at age of 210 days, which also contained lower values of Na%, K%, LS% (loss of sugar to molasses%) and AC (alkalinity coefficient), as compared with beets harvested earlier after 180 days from sowing, in the first and second season. These results are in agreement with those obtained by Cakmakci (2002); Aly (2006); Hussein, et al (2012); Awad, et al (2014) and Klara, et al (2017).…”

Section: Effect Of Harvest Age On Quality Parameterssupporting

confidence: 93%

“…*Annual report of sugar crops council, Jan 2016 Mahmoud, et al (2008), Yousef and Abdel-Mottaleb (2009) and Enan, et al (2011) reported that the highest sucrose%, juice quality, as well as root and sugar yields/fed were obtained by increasing plant age at harvest from 180 up to 210 days after sowing. Klara, et al (2017) indicated that in all trial seasons, root yield was significantly higher in the earlier drilled plots. On average, prolongation of the vegetation period in spring by 13 days increased root yield by 10.9%.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…It was found that the variance between Pyramide and Kosmas in RY was insignificant, when they were harvested at age of 180 days. Shalaby, et al (2011); Al-Sayed, et al(2012) ;Awad, et al (2014) and Klara, et al . (2017).…”

Section: Effect Of Interaction Between Harvest Age and Sugarmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of some New Sugar Beet Varieties as Affected by Different Harvest Ages under Conditions of Minia Governorate

Nagib¹,

El-Azez²,

Ali³

2018

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two field trials were conducted in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons at Mallawy Agric. Res., Station, (latitude of 28 Ο N, longitude of 30 Ο E and altitude of 49 m above sea level), El-Minia Governorate, Egypt, to study the effect of two harvest ages (180 and 210 days after sowing), on yield and quality of eight sugar beet varieties (Steel, Pyramide, Kosmas, Lammia, Belino, Amelie, Drena, and Beta 398). A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used, in a split plot arrangement and replicated three times. The mainplots were devoted for harvest ages, while the evaluated sugar beet varieties were randomly sown in the sub plots, in both seasons. The results revealed that: 1. Harvest age exhibited a significant effect on all studied traits in both seasons. Beets harvested at older age (210 days after sowing) surpassed those harvested earlier (180 days after sowing) in all traits in both seasons, except loss in sugar yield/fed and α-amino-N%. 2. The tested sugar beet varieties varied significantly in all studied traits in both seasons. Beta 398variety recorded the best values of root, top, and sugar yields/ fed, in both seasons. The best values of sucrose %, loss in sugar/fed and sugar recovery % were obtained by Drena variety in both seasons. Lammia variety recorded the highest values of α-amino-N %, while the highest value of alkalinity coefficient was obtained by Kosmas variety, in both seasons. Planting Beta 398 sugar beet variety and harvesting it after180 or 210 days from sowing could be concluded get the highest productivity and quality of sugar beet under conditions of Minia Governorate.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Harvest Age On Quality Parameterssupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of some New Sugar Beet Varieties as Affected by Different Harvest Ages under Conditions of Minia Governorate

Nagib¹,

El-Azez²,

Ali³

2018

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This might be happened due to increase in temperature and respiration in delay harvest. Similar trend was reported elsewhere (Hemayati et al, 2012;Pavlů et al, 2017 andPaul et al, 2018a). 3).…”

Section: Brix (%) In Juicesupporting

confidence: 92%

Performance of tropical sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as influenced by date of harvesting

Paul¹,

Joni²,

Sarkar³

et al. 2019

Arch. Agri. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

to study the effect of date of harvesting on the yield and quality of tropical sugar beet. The experiment comprised seven varieties viz. SV 889, SV 892, SV 893, SV 894, SZ 35, KWS Serenada and KWS Danicia and two dates of harvesting viz. 135 days after sowing (DAS) and 155 DAS. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Variety, date of harvesting and their interaction showed significant effect on crop characters, beet yield and juice quality of tropical sugar beet. The highest beet length (23.50 cm), individual beet weight (591.6 g) and beet yield (59.16 t ha -1 ) were recorded in SV 894 while the highest brix (15.42%) was observed in SV 893. The lowest beet yield (40.25 t ha -1 ) and brix (13.92 %) were observed in KWS Danicia. In case of date of harvesting, the highest beet length (24.26 cm), beet girth (25.40 cm), individual beet weight (536.07 g) and beet yield (53.60 t ha -1 ) were observed at 155 DAS harvest while the highest brix (14.66%) was recorded at 135 DAS harvest. In interaction, the highest beet length (25.67 cm), individual beet weight (681.2 g) and beet yield (68.12 t ha -1 ) were recorded in SV 894 with 155 DAS harvest whereas the lowest beet yield (32.03 t ha -1 ) was recorded in the interaction in KWS Danicia with 135 DAS harvest. From this study, it may be concluded that SV 894 appears as the promising variety that can be harvested at 155 DAS.

show abstract

“…Under dry environmental conditions, the proper sowing date of sugar beet plays a vital role in growth, production, physiological, and quality traits. It has been reported that the early sowing of sugar beet causes a marked increase in gross sugar content, and the highest yields of roots and sugars [11][12][13]. The key environmental variables that define the start of beet growing are temperature, soil moisture, and slight rate of rainfall [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early Sowing Combined with Adequate Potassium and Sulfur Fertilization: Promoting Beta vulgaris (L.) Yield, Yield Quality, and K- and S-Use Efficiency in a Dry Saline Environment

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field trials for two seasons (2018/2019 and 2019/2020) were conducted to investigate the influence of the addition of three levels of potassium (K) (K1 = 60, K2 = 120, and K3 = 180 kg K2O ha−1) and/or sulfur (S) (S1 = 175, S2 = 350, and S3 = 525 kg CaSO4 ha−1) to the soil, as well as the sowing date (the 1st of September, D1; or the 1st of October, D2) on the potential improvement of physiology, growth, and yield, as well as the quality characteristics of sugar beet yield under soil salinity conditions. With three replicates specified for each treatment, each trial was planned according to a split-split plot in a randomized complete block design. The results revealed that early sowing (D1) led to significant improvements in all traits of plant physiology and growth, in addition to root, top, and biological yields and their quality, gross and pure sugar, and K- and S-use efficiencies based on root yield (R-KUE and R-SUE). The K3 level (180 kg K2O ha−1) positively affected the traits of plant physiology, growth, yield and quality, and R-SUE, and reduced the attributes of impurities, impurity index, and R-KUE. Additionally, the S3 level (525 kg CaSO4 ha−1) affirmatively affected plant physiology, growth, yield and quality traits, and R-KUE, and decreased impurity traits, impurity index, and R-SUE. The interaction of D1 × K3 × S3 maximized the yield of roots (104–105 ton ha−1) and pure sugar (21–22 ton ha−1). Path coefficient analysis showed that root yield and pure sugar content had positive direct effects with 0.62 and 0.65, and 0.38 and 0.38 in both studied seasons, respectively, on pure sugar yield. Significant (p ≤ 0.01) positive correlations were found between pure sugar yield and root yield (r = 0.966 ** and 0.958 **). The study results recommend the use of the integrative D1 × K3 × S3 treatment for sugar beet to obtain maximum yields and qualities under salt stress (e.g., 8.96 dS m−1) in dry environments.

show abstract

Influence of sowing and harvest dates on production of two different cultivars of sugar beet

Cited by 13 publications

References 6 publications

Evaluation of some New Sugar Beet Varieties as Affected by Different Harvest Ages under Conditions of Minia Governorate

Evaluation of some New Sugar Beet Varieties as Affected by Different Harvest Ages under Conditions of Minia Governorate

Performance of tropical sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as influenced by date of harvesting

Early Sowing Combined with Adequate Potassium and Sulfur Fertilization: Promoting Beta vulgaris (L.) Yield, Yield Quality, and K- and S-Use Efficiency in a Dry Saline Environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About