1962
DOI: 10.5006/0010-9312-18.2.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Specimen Geometry and Surface Roughness on Hydrogen Behavior in Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, compared to the polished surface, the grinded surface has high capability of trapping hydrogen, as demonstrated by Song et al [29], who reported that the AZ31 alloy with higher surface roughness possessed higher hydrogen content, regardless of heat treatment conditions of the alloys. Simultaneously, Hudson et al [30] stated that the rate of hydrogen absorption enhanced through roughening surface in SAE1020, types 1017 and 1205 steels. In addition, surface electron work function, which represents the minimum energy for electron immigration from solid surface to adjacent region outside of solid, depends on surface conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, compared to the polished surface, the grinded surface has high capability of trapping hydrogen, as demonstrated by Song et al [29], who reported that the AZ31 alloy with higher surface roughness possessed higher hydrogen content, regardless of heat treatment conditions of the alloys. Simultaneously, Hudson et al [30] stated that the rate of hydrogen absorption enhanced through roughening surface in SAE1020, types 1017 and 1205 steels. In addition, surface electron work function, which represents the minimum energy for electron immigration from solid surface to adjacent region outside of solid, depends on surface conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In apparent contrast to the above, Hudson and co workers [9], and Smith ells and Ransle:-[10] r e- porLed Lh e opposite efrecL of s urface r ou ghn ess. However, in bo th of Lbese cases Lh e exp e rirn en tal procedu res were dirter en t f ronl caLhodiC' ch argin g, a nd involved different mechanisms or h~-droge n infusion.…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 98%