“…The reaction network in our NucNet calculations includes the nuclei with Z 102. For their properties and the related reaction data, we have taken them from the JINA REACLIB database (Cyburt et al 2010), while the α-decay half-lives, βdecay half-lives, fission rates, and fission fragment yields are updated as following: the α-decay half-lives are updated by the experimental values from the National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC); 4 the fission rates and fission fragment yields are updated by the predictions from Hao et al (2022), which are calculated with a phenomenological formula in Bao et al (2015) and the general fission model (Schmidt et al 2016), respectively; the β-decay half-life predictions are replaced by the predictions with seven β-decay models, spanning from the phenomenological formula Zhou (Shi et al 2021), the gross theory RHB+GT (Fang et al 2022), the microscopic nuclear models FRDM+QRPA (Möller et al 2018), RHB+QRPA (Marketin et al 2016), SHFB+QRPA (Minato et al 2022), and SHFB+FAM (Ney et al 2020), to the machine-learning method WS4+NN (Li et al 2022), in order to investigate the influence of β-decay half-lives on the r-process simulations. It should be mentioned that the machine-learning model WS4 +NN has smaller errors in known regions, but the errors would become larger and larger when going away from the known regions, so one should take caution when using the extrapolated results of machine learning.…”