2018
DOI: 10.3390/coatings8110380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sputtering Parameters on Structural, Electrical and Thermoelectric Properties of Mg–Si Coatings

Abstract: Mg–Si thin films (23 ≤ at.% Si ≤ 43) were deposited by co-sputtering of Mg and Si targets in an argon atmosphere. Two groups of samples were prepared with respect to sputtering parameters. The first Group I was synthesized while residual pressure in the reactor was lower than 7 × 10−4 Pa and the second Group II when reactor was pumped down to pressure higher than 7 × 10−4 Pa. The Mg2Si phase appeared for all as-deposited films of Group I around the stoichiometric composition region (29 ≤ at.% Si ≤ 37) and in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong contribution grain-boundary scattering could have on the Seebeck coefficient was also already hinted by other authors [26,40,63]. However, to our knowledge, elaborated experimental studies on the Seebeck coefficient of sputtered thin films, their relation to deposition conditions [64] and proof for the dominant character of the domain size on the Seebeck coefficient of (metallic) thin films [26] remains very limited. Based on the above discussion and in agreement with the latter work of Barber et al [26], we conclude that the microstructural development during film growth can account for the observed variations in the film Seebeck coefficient as function of the layer thickness.…”
Section: Role Of Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The strong contribution grain-boundary scattering could have on the Seebeck coefficient was also already hinted by other authors [26,40,63]. However, to our knowledge, elaborated experimental studies on the Seebeck coefficient of sputtered thin films, their relation to deposition conditions [64] and proof for the dominant character of the domain size on the Seebeck coefficient of (metallic) thin films [26] remains very limited. Based on the above discussion and in agreement with the latter work of Barber et al [26], we conclude that the microstructural development during film growth can account for the observed variations in the film Seebeck coefficient as function of the layer thickness.…”
Section: Role Of Layer Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As shown in Table I, many works have focused on bulk materials, while development of thin films with an optimized ZT value is essential to reduce the size of current thermoelectric devices in order to use them in miniaturized applications such as microelectro-mechanical systems 22 and internet of things. 23 Different methods have been suggested for producing thermoelectric thin films, such as flash evaporation, 24 pulsed laser deposition, 25,26 electrochemical deposition, 27 metal organic chemical vapor deposition, 28 sputtering, [29][30][31][32] and molecular beam epitaxy. 33 Among these techniques, magnetron sputtering has many advantages, such as a good reproducibility, an easy way to control the film composition and homogeneity, environmentally friendly, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%