2013
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e3283616378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of stimulation intensity on paired-pulse suppression of human median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials

Abstract: Paired-pulse stimulation, the application of two stimuli in close succession, is a useful tool to investigate cortical excitability. Suppression of the second response after short interstimulus intervals characterizes paired-pulse behavior. Although paired-pulse suppression is often studied as a marker of cortical excitability in humans, little is known about the influence of stimulation intensity on paired-pulse suppression. To systematically explore the effect of stimulus intensity on paired-pulse suppressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SEP analysis, the N20 was calculated as the difference between the baseline EMG and the first negative inflection after the stimulus, the peak-to-peak amplitude of N20-P25 was assessed as the difference between the N20 and the subsequent positive inflection and the P25 was calculated as the difference between the N20-P25 and the N20 [ 8 , 9 , 33 ]. Paired-pulse inhibition was expressed as a ratio of the amplitudes of the second N20-P25 (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For SEP analysis, the N20 was calculated as the difference between the baseline EMG and the first negative inflection after the stimulus, the peak-to-peak amplitude of N20-P25 was assessed as the difference between the N20 and the subsequent positive inflection and the P25 was calculated as the difference between the N20-P25 and the N20 [ 8 , 9 , 33 ]. Paired-pulse inhibition was expressed as a ratio of the amplitudes of the second N20-P25 (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lakhani et al, 2012; Gatica Tossi et al, 2013), an effect that remains evident at 2.5 times MT (Urasaki et al, 1998). While components of the S1 SEP appear to saturate at some point below the pain threshold (PT) (Parain and Delapierre, 1991), MEG recordings suggest that the asymptote of the S2 response occurs at lower stimulation intensities than for the S1 response (Lin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Constituent Elements Of Pas—sensory Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Accordingly, small amplitude ratios are associated with strong PPS, and large amplitude ratios are associated with reduced PPS. For the somatosensory system, PPS in combination with somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings over the primary somatosensory cortex has been increasingly used to investigate paired‐pulse behaviour, in order to obtain insights into cortical processing modes and to obtain markers of changes of cortical excitability attributable to learning or pathological states (Allison, ; Schwartz & Shagass, ; Shagass & Schwartz, ; Ragert et al ., ; Höffken et al ., , ,b; Lenz et al ., ; Gatica Tossi et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%