Influence of structure on the anisotropy of the fracture toughness of D16 and V95 alloy sheet

Teleshov, V. V.; Neshpor, G. S.; Armyagov, A. A.

doi:10.1007/bf00723140

Mater Sci

1985

DOI: 10.1007/bf00723140

|View full text |Cite

Influence of structure on the anisotropy of the fracture toughness of D16 and V95 alloy sheet

V. V. Teleshov¹,

G. S. Neshpor²,

A. A. Armyagov³

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2009

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…2). The approach is validated by comparing curves I and II with the experimental values of mechanical characteristics that depend on e and appear in (1.2)-shows curves I and II and experimental values of (1.8) for the following commercial aluminum alloys[6,8,11,12] arranged in increasing order of e: 2014-T651 (1), D16T (2), AK-4(T1) (3), D20(T1) (4), AK4-(T1) (5), 7050-T73651 (6), 7075-T765 (7), 7075-T1 (8), D16Pch(T) (9), D16 and V95(10). The full symbols refer to curve I(MN = 21, k = 1), and the open symbols to curve II (MN = 3, k = 2).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Anisotropy of the fracture toughness of structurally inhomogeneous ageing alloys

Kaminsky

Nizhnik

2009

Int Appl Mech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dependence of the fracture toughness K 1C of rolled ageing alloys with structural and crystallographic textures on the loading direction is established. A formula describing the anisotropy of the K 1C and including structural parameters of structurally textured alloys on planes of growth of mode I cracks is derived and validated for aluminum alloys. The influence of crystallographic planes and crack growth direction on K 1C is analyzed for titanium alloy as a rolled material with crystallographic texture Introduction. The anisotropy of strength, plasticity, and crack resistance of structural materials caused by deformation (rolling, forging, forming, etc.) and hardening heat-treatment is studied in [1,2,[5][6][7][8]. Such thermomechanical actions are widely used in forming structural elements for modern engineering. Of importance is to optimize the thermomechanical conditions that would provide the necessary anisotropy of the crack resistance of the material, which would enhance the operational reliability of structures.The research in the field may be developed by establishing the dependence of the anisotropy of the crack resistance of structural alloys on their structural inhomogeneity at the meso-, micro-, and nano-levels, including structural and crystallographic texture [1,5,15]. These types of structural inhomogeneity often appear simultaneously but have different effects on the anisotropy of crack resistance under thermomechanical loads. The structural texture of ageing alloys represents directional changes in the shape, dimensions, and orientation of grains and subgrains of the matrix phases and in the distribution density of disperse particles of the hardening phases on the crack growth planes. This determines the direction of structural embrittlement. The crystallographic texture represents the preferential orientation of crystallites, restricting the number of active slip planes in certain crack growth directions and, therefore, the capability of the material to form plastic zones at the crack tip in these directions, which reduces crack resistance [3,4]. The effect of the crystallographic texture on the anisotropy of crack resistance is much stronger in metals with a hexagonal close-packed (HCP) lattice. Such a lattice has much less active slip systems compared with the face-centered (FCC) and body-centered (BCC) cubic lattices [13].The influence of these types of structural inhomogeneity on the anisotropy of crack resistance is poorly understood. This is why it is impossible to establish the general pattern of its manifestation considering that structural alloys have many phases and their matrix phases have lattices of different types.The present paper examines the individual effects of the structural and crystallographic textures (caused by rolling and heat treatment) of ageing alloys on the anisotropy of crack resistance.1. Influence of Structural Texture on the Anisotropy of Fracture Toughness. We will develop and experimentally validate a structural mechanical approach to evaluating and predi...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Anisotropy of the fracture toughness of structurally inhomogeneous ageing alloys

Kaminsky

Nizhnik

2009

Int Appl Mech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Influence of structure on the anisotropy of the fracture toughness of D16 and V95 alloy sheet

Cited by 1 publication

References 2 publications

Anisotropy of the fracture toughness of structurally inhomogeneous ageing alloys

Anisotropy of the fracture toughness of structurally inhomogeneous ageing alloys

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About