2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface electric charge of Ti implants on osteoblastic interaction: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zeta potential values of the Zn-free and Zn-containing PEO coatings are approximately the same and amount to −13 and −12 mV, respectively. The negatively charged implant surface attracts positively charged Ca 2+ ions from the biological environment, which are deposited on the surface and act as a driving force for biomineralization, causing osteoblastic attraction and differentiation …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zeta potential values of the Zn-free and Zn-containing PEO coatings are approximately the same and amount to −13 and −12 mV, respectively. The negatively charged implant surface attracts positively charged Ca 2+ ions from the biological environment, which are deposited on the surface and act as a driving force for biomineralization, causing osteoblastic attraction and differentiation …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negatively charged implant surface attracts positively charged Ca 2+ ions from the biological environment, which are deposited on the surface and act as a driving force for biomineralization, causing osteoblastic attraction and differentiation. 43 3.5. Zn Ion Release.…”
Section: Wettability and Zeta Potential Of Peo Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the difference in roughness caused by the different additive manufacturing methods evaluated is an important parameter to be considered, the authors of this review can infer that all the values found were biocompatible for osteoblastic adhesion and proliferation and it is not possible to determine the best roughness and technique due to the heterogeneity of the studies. However, as the increase in this favors the increase in the available surface area in vivo, it may favor the mechanical imbrication [ 34 , 35 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ], while, in cellular terms, this should be correlated with the morphology of the peaks and valleys as well as the hydrophilicity and electrostatic condition of the surface that interact synergistically for osseointegration [ 59 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albumin adsorption decreased with a decrease in surface free energy, leading to a decrease in α-helix content . Complementary studies have also evaluated the effect of surface free energy components (dispersive and polar) on fibronectin and albumin adsorption, observing an increase in concentration of these proteins on surfaces that have a higher polar component. , In terms of crystallography, Struczyńska et al. observed that the orientation and surface energy of single rutile crystals affect fibronectin conformation .…”
Section: The Role Of Surface Properties On Protein Adsorption (Fbr Ph...mentioning
confidence: 99%