2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface modification on wettability and surface energy characteristics of pharmaceutical excipient powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed that starch particles were efficiently coated, with the nano-silica extensively dispersed on the surface. The surface area coverage (SAC) of the nano-coating achieved with 0.5% w/w Aerosil R972 was in the range of 50% also reported in our previous study [28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was observed that starch particles were efficiently coated, with the nano-silica extensively dispersed on the surface. The surface area coverage (SAC) of the nano-coating achieved with 0.5% w/w Aerosil R972 was in the range of 50% also reported in our previous study [28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Dry coating of corn starch powder was performed with hydrophobic fumed silica (Aerosil R972) using Co-mill (Prism Pharma Machinery, India) following a method similar to the one described in literature [28,29]. A guest particle loading of 0.5% w/w of the total blend was used for the nano-coating procedure.…”
Section: Dry Coating Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFM measurements were made by scanning probe microscope in tapping mode using a size of 2 × 2 μm . Different regions of five different particles of both basmati rice flour and non‐basmati rice flour were scanned for roughness measurement with NanoScope software (version 8.10) . Results obtained were with respect to geometric average roughness or root mean square (RMS) roughness ( R q ) of the flour surface, defined as the standard deviation of the elevation, z ‐values, within the given area, calculated as follows: Rq1Ni=1N()zizave2 where, z ave is the average of the z ‐values within the given area, z i is the z ‐value for a given point and N is the number of points within the given area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 is the SEM micrographs of semi-crystalline and amorphous polyester powder coatings, as illustrated in Fig. 12, the filler was fully dispersed in the semicrystalline polyester powder coating, and lower viscosity help to improve wetting properties [23,24]. All the results showed that the levelling performance of amorphous polyester powder coating was inferior to that of semi-crystalline polyester powder coating.…”
Section: Film Morphologymentioning
confidence: 94%