2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00392-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface modifications to titanium on antibacterial activity in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
184
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
184
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the selectively etched surface might reduce bacterial adhesion (Figure 7-c,d). This could be explained either by the nanoroughness (Figure 4) or the changes observed in the surface chemistry, in particular the increase in the fluorine content ( Figure 5, Table 4), or a combination of both [69,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the selectively etched surface might reduce bacterial adhesion (Figure 7-c,d). This could be explained either by the nanoroughness (Figure 4) or the changes observed in the surface chemistry, in particular the increase in the fluorine content ( Figure 5, Table 4), or a combination of both [69,70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the number of oral bacteria can be reduced by performing oral hygiene procedures using fluoride, mouthwash, and antibiotic administration (Choi et al, 2007), the most efficient way would be preventing the initial adherence and/or colonization by the bacterial population. There are some studies in the literature testing the antibacterial effect of TiO 2 against various microorganisms including Escherichia coli, S. mutans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and C. albicans (Yoshinari et al, 2001). However, E. faecalis was brought under the spotlight in the literature for the first time in terms of antibacterial activity pertaining to photocatalysis in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because systemic antibiotics often do not provide effective treatment for implant infections due to the phenomenon of drug resistance, it is important that the coating of the implant exhibit local antibacterial activity. In order to reduce the incidence of implant-associated infections, several biomaterial surface treatments have been proposed [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. In particular, silver has raised the interest of many investigators because of its good antimicrobial action and low toxicity [30,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several biomaterial surface treatments have been proposed as a means of reducing the incidence of implant-associated infections. There has been investigation into the covalent attachment of polycationic groups [18,19]; ion implantation, such as F+ [20]; impregnating or loading chitosan nanoparticles with antimicrobial agents [21,22]; coating implant surfaces with polymers drug-loaded [23,24]; and coating implant surfaces with either quaternary ammonium compounds, human serum albumin, or silver ions [25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, there are several shortcomings of these proposed techniques including limited chemical stability, local inflammatory reactions due to material composition, and a lack of controlled release kinetics from the coatings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%