2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface pressure distribution of basic flow field on shape and performance of waverider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18. This figure shows that at both the design and the off-design flight Mach numbers, the viscous effects on the drag coefficients and lift-to-drag ratios decrease with increasing angle of attack, owing to the fact that the ratio of the skin friction drag to the total drag decreases with the increase of angle of attack [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Case Verificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…18. This figure shows that at both the design and the off-design flight Mach numbers, the viscous effects on the drag coefficients and lift-to-drag ratios decrease with increasing angle of attack, owing to the fact that the ratio of the skin friction drag to the total drag decreases with the increase of angle of attack [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Case Verificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…. (9) Table 2 lists the specific parameters for the basic flow model. As shown in Table 2, θ DC,2 is the distribution of the flow angles θ just downstream of the lip shock wave DC; M CG and δ CG are the distributions of the Mach number and the angle of the slope along the wall CG, respectively, and the condition M CG (x) = M C means that the Mach numbers along the wall CG are equal to the Mach number at the point C; x CF is the distance from the inlet exit plane to point C along the x axis direction, and the length 1.3 m chosen in this case is about 8 times of the inlet height at the inlet exit plane.…”
Section: (7)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The waverider first proposed by Nonweiler (7) in 1959 is any hypersonic lifting body with an attached shock wave along its leading edge (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) . Since then, because of the excellent aerodynamic configuration of the waverider, it has become one of the most ideal aerodynamic configurations for hypersonic vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the numerical method in this study failed to reflect the influence of laminar-to-turbulent transition in Sharma et al (2018), and Chaudhuri et al (2011) on aerodynamic characteristics, the main flow field wave system structure is captured. In the literature (Ding et al, 2015), a similar method to solve the Euler equation was adopted to verify the applicability of the design configuration in the study of wave-rider theory.…”
Section: Flow Field Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%