2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of surface properties on the flow of a yield stress fluid around spheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gueslin et al [26] provided an in-depth study of the velocity field but this concerned a thixotropic material for which there can be a further, and maybe dramatic, impact of the intense shear rate close to the object surface. Finally some works [27,28] (for spheres) and [24] (for cylinders) provided new detailed data concerning the velocity field around an object moving through a yield stress fluid. They found a significant discrepancy of the velocity field with that computed from simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gueslin et al [26] provided an in-depth study of the velocity field but this concerned a thixotropic material for which there can be a further, and maybe dramatic, impact of the intense shear rate close to the object surface. Finally some works [27,28] (for spheres) and [24] (for cylinders) provided new detailed data concerning the velocity field around an object moving through a yield stress fluid. They found a significant discrepancy of the velocity field with that computed from simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are difficult to test without meaningful measurements of components of the stress tensor other than the shear stress; normal stress measurements are in fact standard in polymer rheology to test constitutive relations. Not only do very few measurements of the normal stress in yield-stress fluids exist, but those that exist do not provide a coherent picture: positive N1 [11] [12] [13] [14] has been reported for some systems, whereas negative N1 has been reported for others [15] [16]. The main issue that has to be dealt with is that their measurement is challenging because the flow is often heterogeneous [17] [18], and the systems may have residual stresses and uncontrolled trapped strains [19], underlining the importance of experimental protocols [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of normal yield stress is of the same order of magnitude as the yield stress of the shear stress. For Carbopol gels used in the present study, Ahonguio et al measured for the first normal stress (in Pa) N 1 = 93.5 + 119 truenormalγ˙. 0.44…”
Section: Comparison Between Numerical and Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Ahonguio et al studied experimentally the flow of a yield stress fluid around spheres with respect to surface roughness. Drag coefficient expression given is described below at low Reynolds numbers: Cd*=18.56+35.68.Od0.77 …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation