2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-012-9674-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Surface Scratches on the Flexure Strength of Soda-Lime Silicate and Borosilicate Glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the surface scratches and pits caused the structural degradation and damage of the glass plates. As suggested by Yang [23] in examining the indentation behavior of ground ULE™ glass and Swab et al [24] in studying the effect of surface scratches on the bending strength of soda-lime silicate and borosilicate glass with a large scratch load, the surface scratches and pits led to the decrease of the apparent surface strength and modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Both the surface scratches and pits caused the structural degradation and damage of the glass plates. As suggested by Yang [23] in examining the indentation behavior of ground ULE™ glass and Swab et al [24] in studying the effect of surface scratches on the bending strength of soda-lime silicate and borosilicate glass with a large scratch load, the surface scratches and pits led to the decrease of the apparent surface strength and modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The pattern of crack formation during scratching of chemically toughened glass was found to differ from heat treated (fully toughened or heat strengthened) glass in that lateral cracks preceded the formation of radial/median cracks in the former (Gross 2012). Unsurprisingly, strength reductions were reported for heat treated and annealed glass after scratching; scratched heat treated glass was stronger than scratched annealed glass indicating that the depth of the flaws induced were smaller than the case depth (Swab et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, most equipment can only obtain information such as width and location (Wiederhorn, 1969;Shand, 1965). As the strength of glass material is determined by both the shape and the depth of surface damage (Glaesemann et al, 1987), 3D characterization herein has drawn the attention of researchers (Swab et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%