2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature- and depth-dependent viscosity structures on postseismic deformation predictions for the large 1946 Nankai subduction zone earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory experiments of rock deformation show that effective viscosities depend strongly on temperature, stress, mineralogy, and presence of water [e.g., Kirby , ; Karato , ; Karato et al ., ; Karato and Wu , ; Kohlstedt et al ., ; Ranalli , ; Hirth and Kohlstedt , ; Dimanov and Dresen , ; Korenaga and Karato , ; Mehl and Hirth , ], all of which imply spatial variation of effective viscosity. The increase of temperature with depth is probably one of the most important factors influencing crustal viscosity, as has been recognized in several studies of postseismic deformation [e.g., Katagi et al ., ; Riva and Govers , ; Yamasaki and Houseman , , ]. Lateral variations of crustal viscosity are also plausible, especially in the context of a major seismogenic zone beneath which lithological contrast, grain size reduction, shear heating, or fabric development may have developed [e.g., Billen and Houseman , ; Montési , , ; Dayem et al ., ; Platt and Behr , ; Takeuchi and Fialko , , ; Traoré et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory experiments of rock deformation show that effective viscosities depend strongly on temperature, stress, mineralogy, and presence of water [e.g., Kirby , ; Karato , ; Karato et al ., ; Karato and Wu , ; Kohlstedt et al ., ; Ranalli , ; Hirth and Kohlstedt , ; Dimanov and Dresen , ; Korenaga and Karato , ; Mehl and Hirth , ], all of which imply spatial variation of effective viscosity. The increase of temperature with depth is probably one of the most important factors influencing crustal viscosity, as has been recognized in several studies of postseismic deformation [e.g., Katagi et al ., ; Riva and Govers , ; Yamasaki and Houseman , , ]. Lateral variations of crustal viscosity are also plausible, especially in the context of a major seismogenic zone beneath which lithological contrast, grain size reduction, shear heating, or fabric development may have developed [e.g., Billen and Houseman , ; Montési , , ; Dayem et al ., ; Platt and Behr , ; Takeuchi and Fialko , , ; Traoré et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Nankai subduction zone, realistic models of viscoelastic structure using empirically derived temperature‐dependent viscosities with spatial heterogeneities have been developed [ Katagi et al ., ]. Given that the geodetic postseismic deformation field of the 1946 Nankai earthquake ( M 8.0) could not be explained by viscoelastic relaxation using a realistic viscosity structure, other effects (e.g., interplate coupling on the plate interface, afterslip, and poroelastic rebound) appear to be required to explain the deformation [ Katagi et al ., ]. These results clearly show that the detailed viscosity structure should be considered when attempting to accurately evaluate the viscoelastic relaxation component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DDV structure used in this study differs from previous multilayer models (e.g. Pollitz et al 1998; Hetland & Hager 2003, 2006; Vergnolle et al 2003); we define the creep viscosity here to have an exponential dependence on depth [as also used by Katagi et al (2008), Riva & Govers (2009) and Takeuchi & Fialko (2012)]. This model represents approximately the effect of temperature increasing with depth, simplified to facilitate exploration of the relevant parameter space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%