2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature and pH on the anammox process: A review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
3
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no need for aeration and an extra carbon source dosage in the anammox process; thus, anammox-based technologies are cheaper than the traditional nitrification-denitrification combination. Despite obvious advantages, there are several disadvantages of the anammox process: anammox bacteria are relatively sensitive to drastic changes of technological parameters, such as pH, temperature or free ammonia (Jin et al 2012;Tomaszewski et al 2017). Moreover, anammox bacteria grow slowly in comparison with other nitrogen removal bacteria [doubling time from 3.6 (Tsushima et al 2007) to 18 days (Trigo et al 2006)], which is the reason of the problems with a fast startup of the process in a technological scale, both at the beginning of the performance and after the operational problems Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no need for aeration and an extra carbon source dosage in the anammox process; thus, anammox-based technologies are cheaper than the traditional nitrification-denitrification combination. Despite obvious advantages, there are several disadvantages of the anammox process: anammox bacteria are relatively sensitive to drastic changes of technological parameters, such as pH, temperature or free ammonia (Jin et al 2012;Tomaszewski et al 2017). Moreover, anammox bacteria grow slowly in comparison with other nitrogen removal bacteria [doubling time from 3.6 (Tsushima et al 2007) to 18 days (Trigo et al 2006)], which is the reason of the problems with a fast startup of the process in a technological scale, both at the beginning of the performance and after the operational problems Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…causing the process efficacy failure. Usually, it takes from 100 to 390 days to start-up of anammox reactor (Tomaszewski et al 2017); thus, fastening the start-up process would be advisable especially from the economic reasons. In situation of inoculating systems with the anammox biomass, the fast start-up problem can be overcome, but still there is no sufficient knowledge about the ecological relationships existing in such a community among various nitrogen removal bacterial groups (Liu et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen removal was probably improved by the denitrification, which existed simultaneously in the bioreactor [2], what can be proved by COD and nitrate removal. Average ratio of nitrate produced to ammonium consumed was between 0.13 -0.20, what is lower than proposed for anammox process stoichiometric value (0.26) [1]. When NLR achieved 1.391 kg N/m d and 1.023 kg N/m 3 d, during landfill leachate and synthetic wastewater treatment, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As a consequence, it reduces operational costs (up to 60%), what is one of the most important advantages. The other advantages over the nitrification-denitrification system are: higher nitrogen removal rate, lower bioreactor volume, lower greenhouse gasses emission and lower excess sludge production (by 90%) [1]. Anammox process is particularly suitable for the treatment of wastewater with high nitrogen concentration and a deficiency in organic carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doubling period (10–14 days) is the main obstacle to anammox application . Anammox is a pH dependent process and substrate transfer plays an important role in the retention of anammox biomass. Biomass retention efforts have led to the development of different concepts such as attached growth using different supports, granulation, hybrid reactors, etc.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Anammox Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%