2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of temperature and pretreatments on the anaerobic digestion of wastewater grown microalgae in a laboratory-scale accumulating-volume reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since lipids extraction efficiency is easier to control than cell lipid content, this value was assumed to be constant (25%). In the scenarios 1, 6 and 7, the efficiency of anaerobic digestion (45%, 30% and 60%, respectively) was compared, since different studies have reported anaerobic digestion efficiencies within this range of values [51,52]. …”
Section: Scenarios Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since lipids extraction efficiency is easier to control than cell lipid content, this value was assumed to be constant (25%). In the scenarios 1, 6 and 7, the efficiency of anaerobic digestion (45%, 30% and 60%, respectively) was compared, since different studies have reported anaerobic digestion efficiencies within this range of values [51,52]. …”
Section: Scenarios Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies investigating the importance of storage effects on microalgal biomass on CH 4 yield have come to similar conclusions. Kinnunen et al [23] observed positive effects on the CH 4 yields of a freeze-thawed microalgae biomass mix (fresh: 103 Nm 3 t −1 VS; frozen: 155 Nm 3 t −1 VS, +50%), which was cultivated in wastewater and subsequently digested under psychrophilic conditions (20°C) in accumulating-volume reactors. In another experiment of the same study, a similar effect was observed under mesophilic conditions (37°C) in continuously stirred tank reactors, where untreated biomass yielded 179 Nm 3 t −1 VS compared to frozen biomass 205 Nm 3 t −1 VS (+14%).…”
Section: Biomass Storage: a First Indirect Pretreatment Step?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several pretreatment methods were tested, including thermal treatment, ultrasonication, enzymatic degradation, milling, and a combined approach using milling and enzymes. For experimental purposes, a well-defined strain, i.e., SAG 276-1 A. obliquus (Turpin) Hegewald & Hanagata (formerly referred to as Scenedesmus obliquus (Turpin) Kützing) based on ITS1/5.8S/ITS2 (=ribosomal DNA) [21,22] was used, in contrast to other studies, which used a mix of microalgae of an undefined molecular phylogeny [11,[13][14][15]23]. A. obliquus has already been used as a biomass source for AD in previous experiments [7,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, biodegradability was increased from 38% to 48%. Kinnunen et al studied freeze‐thaw pretreatment to microalgae mix culture ( Pediastrum sp., Micractinium sp., and Scenedesmus sp.) with 20°C for 24 hours and concluded that freeze‐thaw treatment increased protein hydrolysis and ultimate methane yields improved from 179 to 227 mL CH 4 /g VS added when compared with untreated microalgae.…”
Section: Pretreatment Methods Applied To Microalgal Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%