1999
DOI: 10.2307/1565543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Temperature, Body Size, and Inter-Individual Variation on Forced and Voluntary Swimming and Crawling Speeds in Nerodia sipedon and Regina septemvittata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that there is an optimal substrate on which the snake moves fastest, which is consistent with quantitative experiments on the speed of garter snakes moving on different substrates (21). This maximum velocity v x max is qualitatively the same over a range of values of areal fraction of muscle at each cross-section ␦, and the Hill parameter c. However, v x max is sensitive to changes in VЈ the maximal muscle contraction velocity which varies with temperature: for example, v x max at 25°C is more than twice larger than that at 15°C (solid green and blue curves) when Pr ϳ 1, consistent with observations (22,23). The Hill relation (Eq.…”
Section: Optimal Undulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This implies that there is an optimal substrate on which the snake moves fastest, which is consistent with quantitative experiments on the speed of garter snakes moving on different substrates (21). This maximum velocity v x max is qualitatively the same over a range of values of areal fraction of muscle at each cross-section ␦, and the Hill parameter c. However, v x max is sensitive to changes in VЈ the maximal muscle contraction velocity which varies with temperature: for example, v x max at 25°C is more than twice larger than that at 15°C (solid green and blue curves) when Pr ϳ 1, consistent with observations (22,23). The Hill relation (Eq.…”
Section: Optimal Undulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, aquatic performance should benefit from relatively wide TPCs for locomotor capacity in species inhabiting shallow water bodies, which are characterized by substantial temperature stratification and daily fluctuations (Jacobs et al, 1998). Accordingly, tests on individual species of semi-aquatic ectotherms have revealed that the thermal sensitivity of swimming is low compared with running (Stevenson et al, 1985;Else and Bennett, 1987;Finkler and Claussen, 1999;Marvin, 2003a, b). Our comparative analyses to some extent challenge this idea.…”
Section: Differences In Tpcs Of Running and Swimmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, one would expect that functions acquire the thermal dependence that optimizes the performance in the environment in which they are ecologically relevant. Accordingly, the thermal sensitivity (the slope or derivative of TPC) of crawling capacity is higher than that of swimming in individual species of semi-aquatic snakes (Stevenson et al, 1985;Finkler and Claussen, 1999), some salamanders (Else and Bennett, 1987;Marvin, 2003a, b;Gvoždík et al, 2007; but see Wilson, 2005). On the other hand, one may expect that the potentially conflicting thermal demands set by the two environments may hamper the optimization of TPCs, especially for functions that rely on the same biochemical and physiological systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the forces are sufficiently great to overcome sliding frictional resistance, the animal moves (Gans 1974). A snake's terrestrial locomotor speed is affected by frictional differences among substrates (Scribner and Weatherhead 1995) and also varies with the substrate area with which the snake's body is in contact (Finkler and Claussen 1999). For amphibious species such as sea kraits, it is important to crawl and swim well due to requirements of foraging in the ocean and returning to land for mating, oviposition, digestion, and skin sloughing (Heatwole 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%