An enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process is currently one of the most economical and practical ways to reduce high phosphorus content in wastewaters. Under sequential conditions of anaerobic and aerobic environments, the phosphateaccumulating organisms (PAOs), which are able to accumulate intracellular phosphorus in a much higher quantity than other microorganisms, become predominant. In anaerobic stage, the PAOs absorb readily biodegradable substrate by destroying their storage polyphosphate to form adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP), sequentially, and releasing free phosphate to the bulk solution. The substrate taken up is metabolized in the following aerobic stage to produce energy some of which replenishes the polyphosphate storage pool by absorbing phosphate from the bulk solution. The amount taken up aerobically is more than that released anaerobically; hence the phosphorus in the liquid phase is reduced. Although many researchers have recently attempted to investigate the ecology and microbiology of the EBPR processes using either culture-dependent or -independent approaches, the results are still inconclusive.1 In parallel to microbiologial approach, several investigators have tried to solve this problem through biochemical models which are developed based on mechanistic considerations of the mixed cultures in activated sludge under control conditions. These models, e.g., Comeau model, 2 Mino model, 3 metabolic model, [4][5][6] and enhanced culture kinetic model, 7-9 involve stoichiometry and process kinetic rate equations. Many EBPR systems have been designed and constructed by using the simplified versions of these models. Although most of them perform reliably as expected, some behave unpredictably. One possible explanation of most interest to the researchers is that, under certain operating conditions, other microorganisms are more selectively favored than the PAOs, hence diminishing the EBPR performance. The microbial group believed to be a major competitor of the PAOs are the glycogenaccumulating organisms (GAOs), which also assimilate substrates under anaerobic conditions. 10 As named, this microbial group aerobically synthesizes and stores glycogen as its primary energy source. Since polyphosphate is not involved in substrate assimilation, ABSTRACT: Four anaerobic-aerobic sequencing batch reactors with 9-day of sludge age were operated under a 12-hour cycle of 5, 290, 360, 60, and 5 minutes for the filling, anaerobic, aerobic, settling, and withdrawal periods, respectively. The results indicated that increasing temperature from the phosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs) preferred temperature of 20°C by either pulse (5°C after every 5 days) or step (1°C per day) manner had negative impacts on the PAOs' activities, particularly on the aerobic phosphorus uptake. However, the pulse-increase scenario, especially from 30 to 35°C, caused more severe impacts than the stepincrease scenario. On the contrary, the shock in a decreasing manner regardless of experimen...