2014
DOI: 10.3390/lubricants2040177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Temperature on the Frictional Properties of Water-Lubricated Surfaces

Abstract: Abstract:The influence of temperature on the lubricating properties of neat water for tribopairs with varying bulk elasticity moduli and surface hydrophilicity, namely hard-hydrophobic interface (h-HB), hard-hydrophilic interface (h-HL), soft-hydrophobic interface (s-HB), and soft-hydrophilic interface (s-HL), has been investigated. With increasing temperature, the coefficients of friction generally increased due to the decreasing viscosity of water. This change was more clearly manifested from soft interfaces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, friction forces can be easily measured and the application of the soft EHL model to the contacts in this study can be Given that the mechanical properties (contact pressure) of the steel-PDMS and PDMS-PDMS tribopairs are similar (Table 1), drastically different lubricating properties of the model mucus fluids for the two interfaces can be attributed to the different surface hydrophilicity of steel vs PDMS pins. This has been well described in a number of previous tribological studies involving aqueous solutions, 43 and is also clearly manifested in much more effective lubrication of PBS-0 at steel-PDMS (FIG. 5a) than at PDMS-PDMS interfaces (FIG.…”
Section: B-1 Modelled Lubrication Thickness and Friction Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, friction forces can be easily measured and the application of the soft EHL model to the contacts in this study can be Given that the mechanical properties (contact pressure) of the steel-PDMS and PDMS-PDMS tribopairs are similar (Table 1), drastically different lubricating properties of the model mucus fluids for the two interfaces can be attributed to the different surface hydrophilicity of steel vs PDMS pins. This has been well described in a number of previous tribological studies involving aqueous solutions, 43 and is also clearly manifested in much more effective lubrication of PBS-0 at steel-PDMS (FIG. 5a) than at PDMS-PDMS interfaces (FIG.…”
Section: B-1 Modelled Lubrication Thickness and Friction Coefficientssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Nevertheless, it should be emphasized that this was observed for both thin films as well as flooded lubrication in the case of PGM:b-PEI.Several differences were observed for the PDMS-PDMS interface compared to the steel-PDMS interface. Firstly, for the PDMS-PDMS interface, µ was high at low speeds but was decreasing with increasing speed for the flooded lubrication with PBS-0, which is typical behavior of aqueous lubrication for hydrophobic interfaces without surface-adsorbing additives, highlighting the importance of surface hydrophilization for effective lubrication with water 42,43. Secondly, flooded lubrication of the PDMS-PDMS interface with PGM:b-PEI displayed µ ≤ 0.02 throughout the entire speed range (similar to the steel-PDMS contact).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…100%. While this effect is also observed from the lubrication with water, 56 the reduction in l values in high-speed regime by the lubrication with the mucilage is an order of magnitude larger. Considering that the contact pressure of steel-glass interface is even higher than that of HDPE-HDPE interface (Table I), relatively more feasible lubrication of hydrophilic steel-glass pair than hydrophobic HDPE-HDPE pair by the mucilage can be attributed to its superior wettability.…”
Section: Wetting Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The outstanding lubricating properties exhibited by T. baccata mucilage particularly at soft hydrophilic interface (including halfhydrophilic interface) suggests that it has a high potential as fluid lubricant for biomedical applications such as endoscopes, catheters, or as personal lubricants, where the contact characteristic is basically soft and hydrophilic. 56,57 Further in vitro lubrication studies of T. baccata mucilage as well as biocompatibility studies would be necessary to facilitate the application of mucilage as a hydrogel fluid lubricant for biomedical devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of water for use as a liquid lubricant are its high cooling capacity, good fire-resistance, and low cost [2,3]. However, there is a problem that the viscosity of water is too low to provide lubricating films between contact surfaces [4] . For this reason, several studies on additives to water to enable it to function as a lubricant have been carried out to address the problem [3,[5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%