1992
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-82-589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Temperature, Wetness Period, Plant Age, and Inoculum Concentration on Infection and Development of Ascochyta Blight of Chickpea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each study, the duration of wetness required to achieve either 5% disease severity or 20% disease incidence (W min ) was recorded by reading values from the original graphs or tables. A severity value of 25% was used for Ascochyta rabiei because the slope of the response at 5% was zero (84). Studies that used lesion counts were difficult to compare because the counts could be made per square centimeter, per leaf, or per plant.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each study, the duration of wetness required to achieve either 5% disease severity or 20% disease incidence (W min ) was recorded by reading values from the original graphs or tables. A severity value of 25% was used for Ascochyta rabiei because the slope of the response at 5% was zero (84). Studies that used lesion counts were difficult to compare because the counts could be made per square centimeter, per leaf, or per plant.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many infection models use regression equations, such as those based on polynomials (13,31,39,43,68,84), logistic equations (15,47,68), and complex three-dimensional response surfaces (14,20,26,32,36,49,67,72,93). Other infection models have been constructed using variations of the Analytis Beta function, including infection (5,30,50).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flipper and Genesis 114 also displayed greater resistance at maturity than other cultivars that are rated as more resistant. Since resistance is conditioned by multiple quantitative genetic effects (Gowen, Orton, Thurley, & White, 1989;Vail & Banniza, 2008;Flandez-Galves et al, 2003a) with a relatively large environmental influence (Trapero-Casas & Kaiser, 1992), different genes and possibly pathways may be in operation at different growth stages. This has previously been shown for Ascochyta blight of pea (Prioul, Frankewitz, Deniot, Morin, & Baranger, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that expression of individual resistance genes is triggered by external (environmental/pathogen) and internal (plant age/pathogen) stimuli. Expression of each of these genes can differ at different times in the plants life (Trapero-Casas & Kaiser, 1992;Chongo & Gossen, 2001;Sharma, Pande, & Rathore, 2010), and hence cultivars which show good seedling resistance may not have the same highly effective resistance at maturity. The resistance level to A. rabiei has previously been correlated with chickpea plant age (Nene & Reddy, 1987;Chongo & Gossen, 2001;Basandrai et al, 2007;Sharma et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for fitting Equation (6) were derived from Basandrai et al [22], Trapero-Casas and Kaiser [49], and Chauhan and Sinha [50], and the fit had R 2 = 0.887; for equation (7), data were derived from Trapero-Casas and Kaiser [49], with R 2 = 0.945 (see Supplementary material).…”
Section: Lesion Appearance and Production Of Secondary Inoculummentioning
confidence: 99%