2019
DOI: 10.21062/ujep/396.2019/a/1213-2489/mt/19/6/917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Testing Method on the Course of Anisotropy Coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The courses of testing technology are mostly declarative knowledge, with many specialized terms and relatively independent contents of each part, which leads to the poor systematization of the course and the difficulty of teaching, and students often feel bored when learning; thus the interest in learning is affected [8]. With the number of enrollment and education scale of master's degree students in China expanding year by year in these years, the quality level of students' training is on a downward trend, and there are problems such as single classroom teaching methods and approaches, passive research study habits of graduate students, insufficient research exploration learning ability, weak problem identification ability, and low research innovation ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The courses of testing technology are mostly declarative knowledge, with many specialized terms and relatively independent contents of each part, which leads to the poor systematization of the course and the difficulty of teaching, and students often feel bored when learning; thus the interest in learning is affected [8]. With the number of enrollment and education scale of master's degree students in China expanding year by year in these years, the quality level of students' training is on a downward trend, and there are problems such as single classroom teaching methods and approaches, passive research study habits of graduate students, insufficient research exploration learning ability, weak problem identification ability, and low research innovation ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%