2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijad.2016.080510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the air inlet configuration on the performances of a paraglider open airfoil

Abstract: A finite volume flow solver was used to solve the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations for the 2D flow field on a paraglider open airfoil. The canopy was assumed to be smooth, rigid and impermeable. The parametric study performed concerns the position and the width of the air inlet at the leading edge.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the concave shape of the optimized airfoil eliminated the separation bubbles appearing on the external lower edge of both classical inlets, which not only decreased the effects of the inlet on drag by 20 drag counts compared to the classical inlet, but also it would improve recovery in case of stalling of the paraglider. As a matter of fact, the effects of an opening on the lift and drag characteristics, are less for an airfoil with the SharkNose concept, rather than introducing an inlet to a classical airfoil, as was concluded from this study, and previous studies that investigated different classical inlet configurations numerically or experimentally [10][11][12] to cite a few. Finally, the optimized airfoil with 1%c has a slightly better overall paragliding performance than that with 2%c .…”
Section: Best Inlet Configurationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Additionally, the concave shape of the optimized airfoil eliminated the separation bubbles appearing on the external lower edge of both classical inlets, which not only decreased the effects of the inlet on drag by 20 drag counts compared to the classical inlet, but also it would improve recovery in case of stalling of the paraglider. As a matter of fact, the effects of an opening on the lift and drag characteristics, are less for an airfoil with the SharkNose concept, rather than introducing an inlet to a classical airfoil, as was concluded from this study, and previous studies that investigated different classical inlet configurations numerically or experimentally [10][11][12] to cite a few. Finally, the optimized airfoil with 1%c has a slightly better overall paragliding performance than that with 2%c .…”
Section: Best Inlet Configurationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Several works devoted to the development of control models, guidance systems, and trajectory optimization can be found in the literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Further, a representative number of computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based aerodynamic characterization is available [6,[16][17][18][19][20]. However, few experimental results related to the paraglider cell deformation can be found in recent literature [21].…”
Section: Structural Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical calculations of the flow over the paraglider wing were previously performed in the sense of geometry influence [21,22] or the position of the inlet to the airstreams [23] on the aerodynamic characteristics, whereas the previous research of the authors of this publication studied the sensitivity of paraglider performance to air permeability material change [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%