2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the amount of use on hand motor cortex representation: Effects of immobilization and motor training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there were highly statistically significant difference between two groups regarding patient's functional conditions post educational guidelines. This result comes in agreement with Ngomo et al [23] & Lasanianos [24] who reported that there is considerable loss of strength at the time a muscle is placed at rest. This takes place even with relatively short times of immobility, with every day of bed rest there is to the degree that 3% loss of muscle strength, or up to 20% loss of remaining strength per week of immobilization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While there were highly statistically significant difference between two groups regarding patient's functional conditions post educational guidelines. This result comes in agreement with Ngomo et al [23] & Lasanianos [24] who reported that there is considerable loss of strength at the time a muscle is placed at rest. This takes place even with relatively short times of immobility, with every day of bed rest there is to the degree that 3% loss of muscle strength, or up to 20% loss of remaining strength per week of immobilization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…How do these thresholds vary among individuals and situations? Some members of the MSD axis conduct research on neuromuscular mechanisms that may control the response to excessive exposure, focusing particularly on the biomechanical aspects of motor control (Côté et al, 2008;Fuller, Fung and Côté, 2011) and functional organization of the central nervous system (CNS) (Ngomo, Leonard and Mercier, 2012;Ngomo et al, 2011). For example, acute pain appears to stimulate complex adaptations such as increased movement variability, whereas chronic pain appears to limit variability (Côté and Hoeger Bement, 2010).…”
Section: Wmsd Exposure Measurement and Underlying Physiological Mechamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of these physiological responses could be helpful in suggesting new workplace practices in rehabilitation (Srinivasan and Mathiassen, 2012). Moreover, changes in the CNS have been documented in patients with MSDs (Boudreau, Farina and Falla, 2010;Clark et al, 2008;Ngomo, Leonard and Mercier, 2012;Van Vliet and Heneghan, 2006). The chronicity of the deficit appears to be the main factor related to the decreased excitability, since no variation was observed in relation to pain level, functional deficit or strength deficit .…”
Section: Wmsd Exposure Measurement and Underlying Physiological Mechamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New ways to help the comprehension of the underlying physiopathological mechanisms in the persistence of MSDs are emerging. It has therefore been shown that some lesions caused by MSDs might be associated with, among other symptoms, a cerebral physiological signature specific to the lesion [2][3][4]. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in the neck-shoulder area have accounted an increasing number of people in the active general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent studies have shown that MSDs are not merely local affections at the affected area, but that these lesions are coupled with a cerebral physiological signature specific to the lesion [2][3][4]. It has also been proven that different tasks require different levels of cerebral alert for an optimal performance [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%