2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04797-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Body Schema on Multisensory Integration: Evidence from the Mirror Box Illusion

Abstract: When placing one hand on each side of a mirror and making synchronous bimanual movements, the mirror-reflected hand feels like one’s own hand that is hidden behind the mirror. We developed a novel mirror box illusion to investigate whether motoric, but not spatial, visuomotor congruence is sufficient for inducing multisensory integration, and importantly, if biomechanical constraints encoded in the body schema influence multisensory integration. Participants placed their hands in a mirror box in opposite postu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results provide some evidence to suggest that whole-body motion on the sagittal-anteroposterior axis would be optimally weighted and processed in multi sensory integration. As such, these findings are not only consistent with recent findings provide evidence for dissociable contributions of different aspects of embodiment to multi sensory integration process 77 , 78 , but also add new insights to the existing literature by demonstrating that whole-body motion imagery can differentially contribute to the multi sensory integration process depending on the weighting of embodiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current results provide some evidence to suggest that whole-body motion on the sagittal-anteroposterior axis would be optimally weighted and processed in multi sensory integration. As such, these findings are not only consistent with recent findings provide evidence for dissociable contributions of different aspects of embodiment to multi sensory integration process 77 , 78 , but also add new insights to the existing literature by demonstrating that whole-body motion imagery can differentially contribute to the multi sensory integration process depending on the weighting of embodiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There are also a range of magical illusions involving mirror boxes or reflective glass which alter the source of visual stimulation in ways that people cannot perceive. Experimental research with such equipment has demonstrated how some interesting perceptual illusions can be achieved by creating sensory stimulation in alignment with this wrongly attributed stimulation; for example: If a person places their hands either side of a mirror, so they see one hand reflected in the mirror in the position of the other (non-visible) hand, and then perform a repetitive motion with both hands, after some time, people will perceive the mirrored visible hand to actually be the invisible hand, in some cases even if the invisible hand is rotated compared the visible hand [31].…”
Section: Magical Illusions and Mirrorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual-tactile temporal sensitivity also distinctly influences perception of body ownership and representation. For instance, susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion [when a participant feels their own hand, hidden from view, being stroked while watching a rubber hand get stroked, they feel as if the rubber hand was their own (Botvinick and Cohen, 1998;Liu and Medina, 2017)] can be predicted from a subject's temporal sensitivity to visual-tactile asynchronies (Costantini et al, 2016). Not only is visual-tactile temporal acuity important for perceived body representation, improved development of sensory substitution devices relies on understanding the affected person's perceptual experience, specifically what affects perception of multimodal synchrony (Kristjánsson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%