2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00183-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
141
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
141
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Through investigating the fouling behavior of natural water in three different types of MF and UF membranes, Yamamura et al [12] revealed that carbohydrates were dominant in the membrane foulants regardless of the types of membranes. Other researchers [13,14] considered that a high content of hydrophilic fraction or hydrophilic neutral fraction in the nature water caused serious flux decline, by using hydrophobic and hydrophilic MF and UF membranes on the NOM isolated from different surface water. However, all these studies focused on identifying the membrane organic foulants at the end of few filtration cycles in a batch or bench-scale system, which could cause the results of previous studies on the major foulants to be inconsistent since the organics accumulation on the membrane is a long-term process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through investigating the fouling behavior of natural water in three different types of MF and UF membranes, Yamamura et al [12] revealed that carbohydrates were dominant in the membrane foulants regardless of the types of membranes. Other researchers [13,14] considered that a high content of hydrophilic fraction or hydrophilic neutral fraction in the nature water caused serious flux decline, by using hydrophobic and hydrophilic MF and UF membranes on the NOM isolated from different surface water. However, all these studies focused on identifying the membrane organic foulants at the end of few filtration cycles in a batch or bench-scale system, which could cause the results of previous studies on the major foulants to be inconsistent since the organics accumulation on the membrane is a long-term process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data were collected over one year from July 2015 to July 2016. Although previous studies have reported humic substances to be a major foulant [11,12], Figure 7 shows that they were not removed by the BCF throughout the year; in contrast,~50% of the biopolymer was removed. Thus, it is clear that the decrease of filtration resistance by BCF treatment was due to the decrease of biopolymer concentration.…”
Section: Effect Of Bcf Pretreatment On Mf Membrane Foulingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Humic substances were not found to be important in the formation of the combined fouling layer [36]. And some other studies had showed that the concentration of SMP had a key role in membrane irreversible fouling, while humic substances were not found to be important in the formation of the combined fouling layer [38]. Effects of composition of AOM would be described in Section 3.3.…”
Section: Aeruginosa Chlorella Cyclotellamentioning
confidence: 98%