2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the diffuser type and liquid-to-biogas ratio on biogas upgrading performance in an outdoor pilot scale high rate algal pond

Abstract: Four different types of biogas diffusers (metallic of 2 µm, porous stone, and two ceramic membranes of 0.2 and 0.4 µm) were evaluated to improve the quality of biomethane in an outdoor pilot scale photobioreactor interconnected to an external biogas absorption unit. Each type of diffuser was tested independently using three different liquid to biogas (L/G) ratios (0.5, 1 and 2). No significant difference was recorded in the CH4 concentrations of biomethane (i.e. > 93.0%) working with the different types of dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the presence of aerobic conditions likely supported the growth of methanotrophs, which prevented CH4 emission from the cultivation broth in the photobioreactor (Muñoz et al, 2015;Serejo et al, 2015). The biogas upgrading performance here achieved was superior to that reported by Marín et al, (2020), who observed CH4 concentrations up to 94.6% in a similar outdoors experimental set-up without greenhouse during autumn at a L/G of 1. The CH4 concentrations obtained in the upgraded biogas also fulfilled with the current legislation on the use of biogas (European Committee for Standardization, 2018Standardization, , 2017Muñoz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Biogas Upgrading 13mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In addition, the presence of aerobic conditions likely supported the growth of methanotrophs, which prevented CH4 emission from the cultivation broth in the photobioreactor (Muñoz et al, 2015;Serejo et al, 2015). The biogas upgrading performance here achieved was superior to that reported by Marín et al, (2020), who observed CH4 concentrations up to 94.6% in a similar outdoors experimental set-up without greenhouse during autumn at a L/G of 1. The CH4 concentrations obtained in the upgraded biogas also fulfilled with the current legislation on the use of biogas (European Committee for Standardization, 2018Standardization, , 2017Muñoz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Biogas Upgrading 13mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In addition, the presence of aerobic conditions likely supported the growth of methanotrophs, which prevented CH4 emission from the cultivation broth in the photobioreactor. The biogas upgrading performance here achieved was superior to that reported byMarín et al, (2020), who observed CH4 concentrations up to 94.6% in a similar outdoors experimental set-up without greenhouse during autumn at a L/G of 1. The CH4 concentrations obtained in the upgraded biogas also fulfilled with the current legislation on the use of biogas (European Committee for Standardization, 2018, 2017;.…”
contrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Similarly, N 2 concentration in biomethane during stages I and II averaged 4.2 ± 0.4%. However, the increase in the L/G ratio in stage III mediated an increase in N 2 concentration in biomethane up to 9.4 ± 0.7% as a result of the enhanced dissolved N 2 stripping at higher liquid flowrates [51]. Finally, the resumption of the L/G ratio to 2 in combination with the increase in IC concentration of the culture broth and pH through stages IV and V entailed a decrease in N 2 concentration in the biomethane to average values of 5.3 ± 1.0% (Fig.…”
Section: Biogas Upgrading Performancementioning
confidence: 94%