2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532004000300012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the electrokinetic injection conditions on the separation of DNA fragments in capillary electrophoresis

Abstract: Em análises genéticas por eletroforese capilar com soluções poliméricas existem muitas variáveis que afetam a separação dos fragmentos de DNA. Uma das mais críticas é o processo da injeção da amostra, a qual pode afetar consideravelmente a eficiência e a resolução dos picos. Neste trabalho, estudou-se a influência da composição da amostra e as condições da injeção eletrocinética na separação dos fragmentos de DNA em eletroforese capilar com solução polimérica renovável. Os estudos foram realizados injetando-se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that, in EKI, if the EOF is in the opposite direction to the μ ep of the analytes, the analyte injection is less effective, it becomes interesting to suppress the EOF during the EKI of the Aβ 1-40. Moreover, under suppressed EOF conditions, the injected sample amount depends on the transference number of the analyte (which is a function of the ionic mobility, concentration, and charge of the injected ion relative to all other competing ions) . Thus, the optimal injection of the Aβ 1-40 was anticipated to be at pH around 11.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the fact that, in EKI, if the EOF is in the opposite direction to the μ ep of the analytes, the analyte injection is less effective, it becomes interesting to suppress the EOF during the EKI of the Aβ 1-40. Moreover, under suppressed EOF conditions, the injected sample amount depends on the transference number of the analyte (which is a function of the ionic mobility, concentration, and charge of the injected ion relative to all other competing ions) . Thus, the optimal injection of the Aβ 1-40 was anticipated to be at pH around 11.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, under suppressed EOF conditions, the injected sample amount depends on the transference number of the analyte (which is a function of the ionic mobility, concentration, and charge of the injected ion relative to all other competing ions). 33 Thus, the optimal injection of the Aβ 1-40 was anticipated to be at pH around 11. However, covalently or noncovalently coatings are often easily removed at extreme pHs.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This column was used as a reference, since it has already provided good results for DNA separations with HEC. 25 As an alternative capillary coating, we used another covalently bound coating of PDMA, a polymer with hydrophobic characteristics. 26 Based on successful results acquired with uncoated capillaries, described by Barron et al, 1 we also used this kind of capillary in our experiments for comparison.…”
Section: Capillary Inner Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to define the variables to be optimized, we have taken into account the variables that affect not only the separation mechanism but also the separation performance (resolution). It has been demonstrated elsewhere [15,16] that the performance of a DNA separation is greatly influenced by the injection conditions. Besides, depending on these conditions, changes in the DNA conformation can occur leading to different separation mechanisms [17].…”
Section: Simplex Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%