2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6031(01)00438-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the emissivity of the sample on differential scanning calorimetry measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…33,43 The effect on the baseline was recognized to be the effect of radiative heat exchange, because of the different emissivity of the sample compared to that of the empty crucible in runs without a lid. 43 If crucibles without lids are used, the influence of heat radiation effects must also be considered. In this work, the radiative heat, Q rad , was calculated as the difference between the calculated Q char,s (eq 4) and the experimental heat flow from the residual char, Q char .…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of the Heat Of Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33,43 The effect on the baseline was recognized to be the effect of radiative heat exchange, because of the different emissivity of the sample compared to that of the empty crucible in runs without a lid. 43 If crucibles without lids are used, the influence of heat radiation effects must also be considered. In this work, the radiative heat, Q rad , was calculated as the difference between the calculated Q char,s (eq 4) and the experimental heat flow from the residual char, Q char .…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of the Heat Of Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in these runs, radiation heat flow effects did not need to be considered. 43 Thus, the Q rad correction was not required in these cases, and only Q s was subtracted from the experimental Q run curve.…”
Section: Experimental Determination Of the Heat Of Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, the development of the calorimetric methods resulted in constructing automated systems for thermodynamic analysis of materials based on the technique of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The most important disadvantage of the DSC systems, as applied for investigating wood-based panels, is mass of samples usually being less than 100 mg (e.g., Menczel et al 2009;Wolfinger et al 2001;Ghazi Wakili et al 2003). The low mass of samples has special significance in relation to large inhomogeneity of particles forming particleboard and OSB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a condition where the feedstock has a high composition in biomass, which has higher emissivity when changing to char as the volatile matter evolves, it could receive a higher amount of heat from the wall of the stirred tank reactor, compared to the plastic melt and bio-oil produced, which was mostly contributed to by the pyrolysis of biomass. Biomass char emissivity can reach 0.8 (Wolfinger et al, 2001). The reduction of bio-oil yield with increasing plastic composition in the feedstock was due to the decreased content of biomass in the feedstock to contribute to it; this also reduced the char yield.…”
Section: Tga Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%